2,026
edits
Changes
no edit summary
*Cleanup is required for: [[Gospel of the Hebrews#Sources|Sources]], which is currently (as far as I can tell) not in any stated order; and [[Gospel of the Hebrews#Writings of the Church Fathers|Writings of the Church Fathers]], which is also not in any obvious order - is it meant to be a reconstruction of the Gospel?.
IMHO, I think that the article would be greatly improved with being sorted into clearly-defined sections (History, Groups, Reconstruction (assuming my guess is correct) and Sources). Controversial issues must be dealt with, but due to the controversy it must, imho, be precise and unconfusing. — edited by [[User:Pistevo|<font color="green">Pιs</font><font color="gold">τévο</font>]] <sup>''[[User talk:Pistevo|<font color="blue">talk</font>]]'' ''[[User talk:Pistevo/dev/null|<font color="red">complaints</font>]]''</sup> at 04:15, August 17, 2006 (CDT)
==I vote for deletion==
To Papas: this section about "diverse views in the Church" and much of the article is just plain ''heretical''. It implies that the Gospel of Matthew that we have is some kind of knock-off, second rate when compared to the supposedly "authentic" Gospel of the Hebrews. Where in the world did you get this politically correct nonsense? [[User:Gabriela|Gabriela]] 16:55, August 17, 2006 (CDT)
