Difference between revisions of "OrthodoxWiki:Administrators"
Line 3: | Line 3: | ||
==Empty Articles== | ==Empty Articles== | ||
− | Something which concerns me about the creation of multiple empty articles without even a basic definition first-line and a <nowiki>{{stub}}</nowiki> tag is that visitors to the site can get the impression that there's a lot of nothing here. I know folks who like to come here and hit the "random" link successively, and with lots of empty articles, there will come be a preponderance of disappointment. Perhaps we should leave in-development articles simply as links in existing articles (or places like talk pages) until there's at least a little something to put on them? | + | Something which concerns me about the creation of multiple empty articles without even a basic definition first-line and a <nowiki>{{stub}}</nowiki> tag is that visitors to the site can get the impression that there's a lot of nothing here. I know folks who like to come here and hit the "random" link successively, and with lots of empty articles, there will come be a preponderance of disappointment. This also will skew our results as they appear in search engines. Perhaps we should leave in-development articles simply as links in existing articles (or places like talk pages) until there's at least a little something to put on them? |
What do you think? --[[User:ASDamick|Rdr. Andrew]] 10:13, 31 Jan 2005 (CST) | What do you think? --[[User:ASDamick|Rdr. Andrew]] 10:13, 31 Jan 2005 (CST) |
Revision as of 16:14, January 31, 2005
This is a general discussion page for OrthodoxWiki Administrators to work out various administrative issues, notes, and to-do lists.
Empty Articles
Something which concerns me about the creation of multiple empty articles without even a basic definition first-line and a {{stub}} tag is that visitors to the site can get the impression that there's a lot of nothing here. I know folks who like to come here and hit the "random" link successively, and with lots of empty articles, there will come be a preponderance of disappointment. This also will skew our results as they appear in search engines. Perhaps we should leave in-development articles simply as links in existing articles (or places like talk pages) until there's at least a little something to put on them?
What do you think? --Rdr. Andrew 10:13, 31 Jan 2005 (CST)