User talk:Matrona

From OrthodoxWiki
Jump to: navigation, search

Thank you for your contributions and welcome to OrthodoxWiki! Fr. John

Welcome to OrthodoxWiki!

Hello, Matrona, and welcome to OrthodoxWiki!

Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Please note that OrthodoxWiki is always in development, so not everything works quite right yet. You can help, though!

OrthodoxWiki is a community-edited encyclopedia of Orthodox Christianity. Articles are created and edited by our members, and so everything that we do here is subject to review and revision. The result is a true consensus product, with every interested editor contributing his own knowledge and writing skills. As such, when you feel that criticism of an article is warranted, we encourage you to join in and fix it! Don't worry about breaking anything or doing something wrong—the other editors here are happy to jump in and help you learn.

For newcomers For editors Important notes
About OrthodoxWiki
Frequently Asked Questions (FAQ)
User guidelines
Community Portal
User list
Admin list
OrthodoxWiki News
Help files
How to edit a page
How to create a new page
How to write a great article
Copyright policy
Image licenses
Style Manual
Disciplinary policy
PLEASE read carefully the section of the Style Manual titled OrthodoxWiki:Style Manual (Point of View).

Also please note that other editors will assume that you have read the Style Manual (our official editing guidelines). If you're wondering why an edit was reverted, an article renamed, or any other unexpected changes were made by another editor, check there.

Please also take a few moments to edit your user page by clicking on your name here, so that we can know a bit about you: User:Matrona. Feel free also to add your picture to the OrthodoxWiki:User gallery.

If you are uploading images, be sure you're doing so legally and according to OrthodoxWiki policy. Failure to abide by policy may result in your images getting deleted without warning.

If you would like to experiment with the wiki, please feel free to do so in the Sandbox.

By the way, you can sign your name on Talk and other discussion pages using three tildes, like this: ~~~. Four tildes (~~~~) produces your name and the current date. Please sign your comments on Talk pages, so everyone will easily be able to see who left them.

You'll have to verify your email address before editing any pages. This helps us prevent spam. Don't worry, your email won't be viewable to anyone but the sysops. We respect your privacy.

If you have any questions, see the help pages, add a question to the Questions page, or ask me on my Talk page.

We hope you enjoy editing here and being a part of our community! --Rdr. Andrew 07:52, 8 Mar 2005 (CST)

And above all these things put on LOVE, which is the bond of perfectness

Peace and Grace,

"Unity in necessary things, liberty in doubtful things, love in all things" (In necessariis unitas (in essentials unity), in dubiis libertas, in omnibus autem caritas) --St. Augustine

I invite you to watch this video starting at minute 26 (rare clips of the late Ecumenical Patriarchs Athenagoras and Demetrius, champions of Church unity)


I also invite you to carefully read this paper by a much respected Greek Orthodox scholar.

So faith, hope, love abide, these three; but the greatest of these is LOVE (I Corinthians 13:13).

God Bless. (no reply needed)

First of all, you need to sign your posts on these talk pages. It's not like I can't figure out who you are, Arbible, so I don't know what you're playing at. There's an easy button you can push that signs your name and a timestamp, it's the second button from the right on your screen over every text box.
Second of all, I may not be the brightest bulb on the Christmas tree, but I can figure out the difference between one of something, and two of something. Christ, who is one Person, has two Natures and two Wills. If believing that makes me unpopular or gets me "banished from the empire", so be it: I've already been vindicated! So, when I see the infallible Ecumenical Councils dragged through the mud, Orthodox saints disparaged for standing up against heresy, and the teachings of heretics uplifted, the least I can do is register a protest.
Third of all, I should inform you that throwing a litany of martyrs at me is not going to change my mind. I think that kind of emotionalism is extremely crass, and it is certainly no substitute for the Holy Spirit. --Matrona 11:18, 3 November 2005 (CST)

Peace and Grace,
This is your opinion, which I do fully respect. But let me also respectfully disagree with it. You will find some answers in these notes: [1] and at [2].
If there is anything in common to acknowledge here, this would be the severe limitations of our natural languages (modern and ancient alike), especially when dealing with theological/Christological matters. See some interesting debates from the Summa Theologica at [3],[4]. If our natural languages were 100% efficient and effective to deal with such matters, you wouldn't have seen all these ongoing, centuries-long debates about the same topic. And at Chalcedon we all know that matters of language were overshadowed and complicated by Imperial politics and Church rivalries. LOVE definitely didn't prevail there, especially if you consider the bloody persecution of the Copts (not just their hierarchs) and other non-Chalcedonian Orthodox Christians that followed.
We also have many martyrs who died for their Orthodox faith. This remains precious in God's eyes, even though we are now discovering that we were and are all sharing a common faith (perhaps not yet from your point of view). The Coptic Orthodox Church is also a Church supported with innumerable miracles and apparitions to this present day. But we know that "blessed are they that have not seen, and yet have believed". We are also perhaps the most persecuted of all Churches throughout the history of Christendom, but, as the Bible says, this is a privilege from God, a sign of His tremendous and very special love to us, and something to rejoice in (James 1:2).
Perhaps it would be better if we (Copts) start our own CoptopediA ( The technology is cheap and readily available , though running such a project is not a trivial task and requires immense commitment. But what I enjoy most in this virtual place (OrthodoxWiki) are the prayerful feelings and spirit of brotherhood and unity (or at least sincere aspiration for it) that we do have in common, as Father John and Deacon Andrew have beautifully expressed it at [5].
Thank you for the tip regarding signatures. I simply didn't know about it. No hidden motives (agape love that should be the foundation of all dealings between mankind "is not easily provoked, thinketh no evil"). Signing with my nickname won't add a lot. After all these are just nicknames with empty profile pages. --Arbible
Regarding natural languange limitations, let me also add that Incarnation is a real mystery, as the Bible declares, "And without controversy great is the mystery of godliness: God was manifest in the flesh" (I Timothy 3:16). Trying to describe and "encapsulate" our infinite God within the confines of a finite language will be always shaded with some sort of "imperfection". Let's also not forget that even our brains are limited and finite. --Arbible

I do not know why you attribute the differences between the non-Chalcedonian belief and the Apostolic, Orthodox-Catholic Faith to "differences in language". Although I am not a scholar of languages, I have not yet encountered any human language that failed to account for a distinction between "one" of something and "two" of something. Nor have I encountered a language that was unable to be used to clearly express any form of agreement or disagreement.
Also, while much about nature of God remains an ineffable mystery, that does not give anyone license to ignore or discount what God has chosen to reveal about the Incarnation by way of the Holy Spirit and the Holy Ecumenical Councils, including Chalcedon and Constantinople III. If you disagree with what those councils said, it's fine by me, I don't make it my business to force my beliefs on others. But as long as you fail to accept those councils, DON'T claim your belief is the same as mine. --Matrona 15:54, November 6, 2005 (CST)

Dcn Peter Theodore has beautifully expressed it, "So as for the Tome. I believe it says A, B and C and that C is error. Yet I need not say that the Tome is explicitly heretical, I may, as I do, suggest that it is ambiguous and badly written in places. EO theologians such as Father John Romanides of blessed memory have said the same. Now if Constantine believes it says A, B and D then he may quite happily confess it as Orthodox. And I might talk to him and agree that if it did say A, B and D then it would be free from error. So I then discover that Constantine and I, who both believe A, B and D, find no substantial difference in our own faith. We disagree however in whether the Tome teaches C or D. It is the same with Chalcedon. Our bishops have agreed in Synod that both our Church and the Eastern Orthodox do indeed teach A, B and D while we may still disagree as to whether any historical events or synods taught C, D or indeed E."
St. Cyril explained centuries ago that the Coptic Church believes in "one incarnated nature of God the Word" — that is, one union of two natures — one fully human nature and one fully divine nature.
I believe it's better now to stop this discussion. --Arbible 16:06, November 6, 2005 (CST)

You post that awful quote on my talk page, and then say it's better to "stop the discussion"? I don't know what else to say, except that you've proven my point. --Matrona 16:33, November 6, 2005 (CST)
"Cyril... having excellently articulated the wise proclamation of Orthodoxy, showed himself to be fickle and is to be censured for teaching contrary doctrine: after previously proposing that we should speak of one nature of God the Word, he destroyed the dogma that he had formulated and is caught professing two Natures of Christ" --Timothy Ailouros
"The formulae used by the Holy Fathers concerning two Natures united in Christ should be set aside, even if they be Cyril's." --Severus of Antioch --Matrona 17:19, November 6, 2005 (CST)

On the lack of LOVE

Today, Byzantine Orthodox are rising against each other and even calling the Ecumenical Patriarch a "Turkish Citizen" (technically true, but... ;) - see in Ukraine, Cyprus, and America.

Galatians 5: 14For all the law is fulfilled in one word, even in this; Thou shalt love thy neighbour as thyself. 15But if ye bite and devour one another, take heed that ye be not consumed one of another.


I thought you might be interested in archiving your talk page at some point. I have found that link useful myself. —magda (talk) 16:51, November 6, 2005 (CST)

What if only an ordinary man without a trace of sin died on the cross? The soteriological necessity

Though I mentioned I won't be engaging in this discussion with you any longer, I felt compelled to reiterate what I wrote elsewhere on this Wiki:

St. Cyril of Alexandria called the Blessed Holy Virgin Mary the Theotokos, Mother of God, not mother of the human nature of Christ. From the soteriological viewpoint, if only an ordinary man without a trace of sin (and not the Incarnate Logos) died on the cross, then this would not be enough as an atonement for the (infinite) sin of mankind against the infinite God.

Copts believe in two natures "human" and "divine" that are united in one hypostasis "without mingling, without confusion, and without alteration" (from the declaration of faith at the end of the Coptic divine liturgy). These two natures "did not separate for a moment or the twinkling of an eye" (also from the declaration of faith at the end of the Coptic divine liturgy). In fact, at the time Christ died on the cross, His human soul left his human body, but His divine nature remained united to His human soul and human body.

P.S. Please discard/trash/archive as you see fit after reading (or without reading it if you so wish).

Sorry, but I think you're out to lunch on this one. --Matrona 17:49, November 6, 2005 (CST)

Antiochian (EO) - Syrian (OO) Agreement regarding Divine Liturgy

"In localities where there is only one priest, from either Church, he will celebrate services for the faithful of both Churches, including the Divine Liturgy, pastoral duties, and holy matrimony. He will keep an independent record for each Church and transmit that of the sister Church to its authorities.

"If a bishop from one Church and a priest from the sister Church happen to concelebrate a service, the first will preside even when it is the priest's parish."

Signed: Patriarch Ignatios IV (Eastern Orthodox) Damascus 12.11.1991 [6]

That's the decision of our hierarchs (both sides).

P.S. Please discard/trash/archive as you see fit after reading (or without reading it if you so wish).

I don't know how it is with y'all non-chal folks, but in the Orthodox Church, the One (and only) Holy Catholic and Apostolic Church founded by Christ and maintained in unbroken apostolic succession ever since, circumstances requiring economy do not govern the Church as a whole. --Matrona 17:49, November 6, 2005 (CST)
This shouldn't be taken out of its context as an outcome of the successful EO-OO dialogue and the 1990 Chambesy agreement signed by EO hierarchs (read the title of HH Ignatius IV's statement and the rest of it at [7]). EO are not allowing this sort of provisions yet with the Roman Catholic Church, so it is not just an oeconomia issue. --Arbible 17:59, November 6, 2005 (CST)
First of all, yes, it is an issue of economy. Second of all, my patience with your behavior has been exhausted, so kindly cease posting on my talk page. --Matrona 18:05, November 6, 2005 (CST)


How exactly does a claim to non-adherence to the Council of Chalcedon necessarily preclude an Orthodox faith? Deusveritasest 04:19, December 4, 2008 (UTC)