Page history
February 19, 2009
August 28, 2008
Protected "Sarum Use": what is it with WR articles and ridiculous levels of argument! [edit=sysop:move=sysop]
m→Modern Orthodox Usage
-18
→Modern Orthodox Usage
+49
→Modern Orthodox Usage
+87
→Differences between the Texts
+752
→Modern Orthodox Usage
+178
→Modern Orthodox Usage
+229
no edit summary
+193
→Modern Orthodox Usage
-216
→19th Century Non-Orthodox Revival: link
+37
→Rise of the Sarum Use: links
+32
→19th Century Revival
+87
Undo revision 75035 by JosephSuaiden (Talk)
+233
→Modern Orthodox Usage
m-233
→Sources: inserted missing comma
m+1
→External link: cleanup
-9
→Sources
+8
→Sources
m+2
→Sources: corrected style
+8
→Modern Orthodox Usage: deleted redundancy
-55
→Modern Orthodox Usage: italics
+4
August 27, 2008
→19th Century Revival: links
m+59
→Rise of the Sarum Use: cleanip
m-11
→Modern Orthodox Usage: cleanip
-110
→Modern Orthodox Usage: removing reference to Dom Augustine's caretaker
-134
→Rise of the Sarum Use: removing quote
-618
added quote
m+695
subtitles; links
+308
→History: link
+19
→External link: added altar missal that forms the base document for the ROCOR Sarum
+446
Undo revision 74950 by JosephSuaiden (Talk)
+249
Last undo. This is *not* funny.
-235
Undo revision 74931 by JosephSuaiden (Talk)
+235
Undo: Welcome, and thank you for continuing Aristibrord's edit war. This remains factually incorrect.
-235
→History
m+235
→History: link
m+40
Undo: Fr Augustine hasn't been part of ROCOR for years; And the "English Liturgy" still claims to be a liturgy-- so it's a pastiche.
mUndo: Fr Augustine hasn
+14
→External link: listing sources
+1,019
August 26, 2008
Fr. Augustine is retired ROCOR / English liturgy not a pastiche as it does not claim to be Sarum
m-14
no edit summary
m-6
Sarum Rite moved to Sarum Use: Properly referred to as "Use" rather than "Rite", as it was a use of the Roman rite.
mchanged "rite" to "use"
+29
small "o"-- these were not Orthodox Christians
→History: created link for Dom Augustine
+4
→History
→History
+82
