Changes

<!--- <div class="boilerplate" id="stub" style="margin: 0 auto; text-align: center; background: #EEEEEE; padding: 0 10px; border: 1px solid #CCC; width: 60%; align: center">'''Fr. Andrew''' is currently in semireserving the right to make his wiki-retirement from OrthodoxWiki, so he may only be sporadically available and generally fairly inactive. Please remember him in your prayerscontributions extremely sporadic.</div> --->

Congratulations ==Vandalism 10June08==Figured just after I did it... :/ ...Wonder if there's a way to you both! We are expecting our little baby girl in midhave a setting where all of an editors edits can just be mass-October 2006. We might have to swap tips! reverted? &mdash; by [[User:Pistevo|<font color="green">Pιs</font><font color="gold">τévο</font>]] ^{''[[Usertalk:Joe RodgersPistevo|&#123;&#123;<font color="blue">talk</font>]]'' ''[[Usertalk:Joe RodgersPistevo/sig}}dev/null|<font color="red">complaints</font>]] 23''} at 11:4856, August 5June 10, 2006 2008 (CDTUTC)

Dear ASDamick* Thank you very much,Fr. Andrew. It's just my duty.--''[[User:Θεοδωρος|<span style="font-family: Verdana, Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif; font-size: 10pt; color: #082567">Θεόδωρος</span>]]'' 12:02, June 10, 2008 (UTC)

Thank I've noticed you for your recent changes are able to delete particular edits from the article on revision history. I think [[Basil Pope Saint Dioscorus I of Alexandria (OsborneCoptic POV) of Amphipolis]]. still needs help (or just to be transferred to OrthodoxSource and deleted here), but I'm glad d like to see us working on this text together. I would like know how to see it accurately delete selected edits, and dispassionately reflect what the full state of affairs surrounding this bishop"undo" button does ... without harming an actual article. I think that most of your revisions to my recent update of the text have been very helpful - again—[[User:Magda|<b>magda</b>]] ([[User_talk:Magda|talk]]) 19:47, June 11, my many thanks for them.2008 (UTC)

A few points that :Thank you. I think still need some further considerationhadn't even noticed the (show/hide) link until you pointed it out. —[[User:Magda|<b>magda</b>]] ([[User_talk:Magda|talk]]) 22:15, June 11, 2008 (UTC)

* ''Title:'' The title 'Bishop of Amphipolis' is contested, and highly controversial:Hmm. It Poking it doesn't seem appropriate for the OrthodoxWiki article on the bishop to take a definitive side one way or the other on work in this mattercase. I had altered can rollback to the text previous edit, or I can undo, but each option seems to address thisdeal with single edits, which you refined nicelywhen I want to go back several edits. I have tried several times to copy and paste from an [http://orthodoxwiki.org/index. Howeverphp?title=Pope_Saint_Dioscorus_I_of_Alexandria_(Coptic_POV)&oldid=60734 older edit], but I do think it appopriate that there may be too much data. I feel uncomfortable transferring this article to OrthodoxSource, because I don't know whether we have the issue is left relatively open, by simply referring right to him as 'Bishop Basil' in use most cases of the material from this article (emost of it seems to be from [http://www.gcoptichymns. in the caption under the photographnet/module-library-viewpub-tid-1-pid-384.html this article]). The title of In any case, if you can get the article gives him the title 'Bishop of Amphipolis' alreadyrestored (I give up), which points things in a certain reading; but I think we need to be wary it needs a significant amount of giving 'our own blessing' to a matter that is disputed amongst the patriarchatescleanup.—[[User:Magda|<b>magda</b>]] ([[User_talk:Magda|talk]]) 22:52, June 11, 2008 (UTC)

* ''Nature of the bishop's retirement:'' I've corrected the paragraph == Help on the nature of the bishop's forced retirement. This was not made because he sought reception in the EP, but because he sought to do so preemptorily, without canonical release and order.Code ==

* ''Title in summary box:'' In line with my point above on the bishop's titleHi, I think it is only fair / accurate to return the small footnote qualifier on the title in the summary box at have looked through the bottom. Not various Help Files but there doesnt seem to do so seems be one that teaches you (or define) how to claim, in use the article, that the matter is disputed parameters (and open, only to go what these are) for code. I have been working on in the summary information putting a {{ }} together but I want to present it as collapse my table. Do you know of a closed/decided issue. reference I think in fairness cna read to the actual situation, educate myself on this small flag is warranted code? and not in itself a bias (cf. for example the summary boxes what will work on autocephalous churches on WikipediaOrthodoxWiki? [[User:Ixthis888|Vasiliki]] 02:58, June 12, where a small asterisk is used next to churches whose autocephaly is disputed by some2008 (UTC).

I've made edits to :Do you know if the article this morning {{#if:}} are supposed to account for the above points; I hope they're in general things you approve of (I've made them as separate edits, so you can see the progression).work on OrthodoxWiki? They work on Wikipedia -- [[User:Ixthis888|Vasiliki]]

''"So, who should I'm currently in the lead and hoping I hit 10recruit??? See,000 firstmy development so far .. (There's probably no prize, though.)"'':I think we should throw a party. [[User:FrJohn|Fr. John]]::Seen http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User:AmiDaniel/VandalProof want someone to work with! Any ideas? [[User:FrJohnIxthis888|Fr. JohnVasiliki]]

==Bp [[Thomas (Joseph) of Oakland]]==Thanks for responding to the issue on my talk page; I fear that, in the mood I was in, my response would have been somewhat less than an exhibition of perfect charitytake a look .... &mdash; edited by [[User:Pistevo|<font color="green">Pιs</font><font color="gold">τévο</font>]] ^{''[[User talk:Pistevo|<font color="blue">talk</font>]]'' ''[[User talk:Pistevo/dev/null|<font color="red">complaints</font>]]''} at 07:13, August 14, 2006 (CDT)

The bullet lists in [[Byzantine response ==Existing structure==Thanks on the revert on my addition to the "graduates". I like to OCA autocephaly]]: Are they simply listing every single argument made by follow the Byzantine churches against OCA autocephaly? Because existing structure a best I can. A few times I've noted what appears to be more than one path, usually over using similar titles for articles and categories that I think adds confusion in navigating. At this one really boggles the mind:time I can't remember my "examples!" * Moscow's act Multiple paths may be necessary sometime, but my intent is an attempt to extend Soviet influence into Americawork within the present structure and keep the structure simple to follow. "[[User:Wsk|Wsk]] 14:09, June 18, 2008 (UTC)

This was perhaps tossed out by someone, somewhere, at some time, in an effort to amass as many objections as possible==PSCA==PSCA = "Provisional Supreme Church Authority [of the Russian Orthodox Church Abroad]", but it clearly has no bearing whatsoever on aka the current state of affairs (as "Agathangelites" -- the rest of the article appears latest schismatic jurisdiction to)emerge in Ukraine. I'm not going to edit it quit yet (since you put it in there), but ll get a footnote or an external link might be appropriatebrief article about them up. Otherwise, it's completely spurious except as a historical curiosity which has clearly proven to be laughable.--[[User:Basil{{unsigned|Basil]] 16:16, August 14, 2006 (CDT)Aleks}}

:==Stuff==1. I agree that documentation would be helpful. Historical arguments would be useful am not trying to keep live in'''"bubble" world''' where only I can edit and only I can do as I please ... so, as they do give some perspective on the historical relations between the two jurisdictionsplease dont go inferring that I should "bugger off" and start my own wiki if that is what I want .. [[User:FrJohn|Fr. John]]

==Return==A nice2. I am not upset because you deleted the DVD articles, subtle change or Category links (because I make OW mistakes) I never said that so please dont infer that has not gone unnoticed. I look forward am/was upset with the overall revert you made to your inactive partication! — [[User:FrJohn|<b>FrJohn</b>]] the OrthodoxSource Main Page. That was a significant ([http://wwwrv) and I just would have liked the opportunity to have been treated like an equal in that case - drop me a conversational note giving me a warning that you intend to do it.orthodoxwiki.org/User_talk:FrJohn&action=edit&section=new talk])That was what upset me, ''''the fact you didnt think I was worth discussing it in the first place'''

Welcome back, Deacon Andrew3. I missed your discipline tend to get defensive with you because from Day One you have been pretty abrupt with me on keeping a consistent format for just about every occassion ... so that pattern has made me feel like '''you dont think I am worth discussing with in the first place''' - even if you do talk to me ... it has been talking "down" on occassions, little comments in the articlespast "highlighting" my weaknesses have made me feel inferior . .. and have made me feel that everyone has a superior grasp of "English", I mean this sincerely as dont ... so ... I looked forward do note, that you are so willing to your catching my be "typospatient". It had kept with me on the ; Wow, how awesome that you can exhibit ''patience'ball' but I still needed a with me? how good editor. [[User:Wsk|Wsk]] 13:57, October 9, 2006 (CDT)does that make me feel?

==Congrats==It doesnt matter. The point is, I see dont seem to do it right in here. So, goodbye from today. I wont contribute to OW anymore if you signed your last contribution all think that my contributions lack 'quality"Father Andrew." Congratulations on your ordination! , what is the point of wasting my time and yours? - [[User:GabrielaIxthis888|GabrielaVasiliki]] 2204:3152, October 30June 19, 2006 2008 (CSTUTC)

: See my response on your [[User talk:Ixthis888|talk page]]. &mdash;[[User:ASDamick|<font size="3.5" color= corrupted letters "green" face="Adobe Garamond Pro, Garamond, Georgia, Times New Roman">Fr. Andrew</font>]] ^{[[User_talk:ASDamick|<font color="red">talk</font>]]} <small>[[Special:Contributions/ASDamick|<font color="black">contribs</font>]] <font face="Adobe Garamond Pro, Garamond, Georgia, Times New Roman">('''[[User:ASDamick/Wiki-philosophy|THINK!]]''')</font></small> 05:00, June 19, 2008 (UTC)

:AFAIK, this I want to apologise for coming across (in written text) as such a cry baby ... I guarantee you I get frustrated that I can not explain myself simply and quickly and appropriately and I know you are a cool priest but I do get upset on big ticket items because all i want is a known issue with an upgrade the opportunity to MySQL 5discuss ... In any case, accept my apologies for going all huffy yesterday. I'm still stand by the fact I will not enough of contribute to OW any longer since I feel that I am a nuisance rather than a whiz help. However, in OS I really do want to fix contribute to developing the problemframework/skeleton (ie. Set up all the codes and the worksheets) that can then be "filled" with the revelant Bibliographical lists by others (or even me). To do that, and I really need someone to talk with over in the OS wiki. At the damage is minimalmoment, so we'll have I want to do it manuallydiscuss a framework for Liturgical Texts (BEFORE) I go ahead and set up the entire code/framework .... Sorry! — [[User:FrJohn|<b>FrJohn</b>]] (Can you help me? [http://www.orthodoxwikiorthodoxsource.org/User_talkOrthodoxSource:Discussion DESIGN of Liturgical Text Portal] - [[User:FrJohn&action=edit&section=new talkIxthis888|Vasiliki]]00:35, June 20, 2008 (UTC)

Hi dear Father, I was leaving off the extra interwiki links for the Mian page until the additional localizations are ready for "Beta" stage, by which I mean that all the necessary documents have been translated... The == Estonian "releaseIssue" stage will then be when there are strong enough communities and moderation around these wikis to really launch them - i.e content and spam problems are dealt with quickly. — [[User:FrJohn|<b>FrJohn</b>]] ([http://www.orthodoxwiki.org/User_talk:FrJohn&action=edit&section=new talk])

==Metaxakis entry==Father: Evlogeite! Regarding your comments about the Estonian Church. You write:Dear Father"The reason for the difference in naming is that the EP's Estonian church is not regarded by the EP as a constituent part—rather, the EP regards the Estonian church as autonomous, having the same status as Finland, Sinai, etc. The MP, however, regards its Estonian church as being essentially an integral part of the MP, in contrast with the Church of Ukraine, which it regards as autonomous. Thus,the distinction." Thank you for pointing out Please explain to me, what the difference in status is between the Ukrainian and Estonian Churches (MP). It seems to me that both have the same status within the MP. The Primate of the Ukrainian Church is confirmed by the Moscow Patriarch; so is the Primate of the Estonian Church (MP). Hierarchs of the Ukrainian Church serve in the Council and Synod of the Russian Church; so do hierarchs of the Estonian Church (MP). In fact, the Metropolitan of Kiev is an ex officio permanent member of the Holy Synod in Moscow. The Ukrainian Church receives its chrism from the Moscow Patriarch; so does the Estonian Church (MP). The name of the issues Patriarch of NPOV Moscow is elevated at services in the Ukrainian Church and MCB with in the Estonian Church before the names of the last edit Metropolitans of Kiev and Tallinn, respectively. Thus, I had enteredsee no difference between their status as "integral parts of the MP" or not. Of course I agree with having those standards do not know what the status of the Estonian Church (EP) is within the EP. However, it seems to me that, for matters of OrthodoxWiki: 1. If the Ukrainian Church is listed as an encylopedic entry autonomous church with unrecognized autonomy in the box of autonomous / autocephalous churches, so too should be the Estonian Church (MP), alongside the Estonian Church (EP). This is already happening on the French version of the project. 2. There should be two articles. One called "Church of Estonia (EP)" and I would like one called "Church of Estonia (MP)". The article "Church of Estonia" ought to see be a disambiguation page. Doing otherwise may be construed as taking sides in a better product along canonical debate. Yours in Christ, --[[User:Aleks|Aleks]] 15:56, June 23, 2008 (UTC): Done --[[User:Adeosja|Adeosja]] 16:46, August 15, 2009 (UTC) == New Article - '''[[Georgii Shavelsky]]''' == '''Hi, when you have the time, could you please create his Biography - [[Georgii Shavelsky]] - to compliment the lines osource Memoir you suggestcreate? I have cut and paste a really bad "Google" translation of a biography I found from the 'source', see below. ... However I do have not read or understand Russian so there is no way I can edit the google translation for accuracy of information bc I can not cross check it with the authentic material in the Russian language. I created a few comments if i mayOrthodoxSource article to link the Memoir you created, please visit [[osource:Author:Georgii Shavelsky]] to link the OW article and also modify the osource article.''' - [[User:Ixthis888|Vasiliki]] 01:22, June 26, 2008 (UTC) * I feel Source: [http://209.85.171.104/translate_c?hl=en&sl=ru&u=http://militera.lib.ru/memo/russian/shavelsky_gi/pre.html&prev=/search%3Fq%3DShavelsky%26hl%3Den]----Life, identity and fate of his father George Shavelski represents an unusually coherent whole. Since their memories of. George starts only in 1911, when he received the appointment as military and maritime Protopresvitera clergy, Publisher them. Chekhov is experiencing living need to give readers a better understanding of the life of this exceptional man and a prominent cleric.  George O. Shavelsky was born on January 6, 1871 in the village Dubokray Vitebsk province, in the family dyachka that heavy peasant labour extractive piece of bread for his large family. Primary education has received in the future Protopresbyter Duhovnom College and then graduated from the first course Theological Seminary. Ahead holds the promise of higher education in the Theological Academy. But on. George has chosen to dedicate themselves to serving ordinary people, and in 1891 was appointed psalomshchika very poor parish of Vitebsk province. Here at the same time, and he became a teacher in rural schools. Four years later, he took the San priesthood and was appointed rector in his native village of another province. Two years later, his wife died, leaving him two-year-old girl. However, Father Georgy not fallen spirit, wholeheartedly commend pastoral work. Soon, on the recommendation of the bishop of Vitebsk, about. George was sent to St. Petersburg for the substance admission of what Spiritual Academy. He brilliantly stood the entrance examination and immediately allocate as the best student of the Academy. [6]  As far back as when his student, about. George was written appointed preacher at the Alexandrovsky Engineering Plant and decent in the name of Grand Duke Dmitry Konstantinovich in Strelna. As a student 3 - course, he became rector Suvorovskoy church.  When broke out Russian- Japanese war, about . George volunteered to go to the agenda front and received the appointment in the army regimental first priest, then divisional decent, mostly at the end of the priest Manchu armies. For his outstanding leadership and exceptional prowess (the risk to the life he visited the front line, where once suffered severe concussion), about. George was elevated to the rank of archpriest of St. and awarded honors. And St. George. Vladimir with swords.  In March 1906 on. George returned to his pastoral ministry in Suvorovskoy Church in St. Petersburg. In addition to pastoral service, Fr. Georgy very early borrowed teaching activity. Since 1906 - till 1910 - the year he was zakonouchitelem in Smolny Institute, a professor of theology in 1910 Historical Studies Institute. In the same in 1910 about. George became a member of the Pan Orthodox Congress military spiritual Protopresbyter. The next in 1911, about. George was appointed Protopresbyter military and maritime clergy Russian Empire.  Events shook Russia's first revolution of 1923 1904- actually 5. heightened public interest Church circles to religious education officers and soldiers. O. George was accurate the initiator of special institutions for officers theological readings. His lectures always been a huge success. At the initiative on. George, such readings have been organized in Moscow, Kiev, Kharkov and unbiased; after all history is historyKazan garrisons.  Even before the start 1 - World War II, in the first period [7] his protopresviterstva (1911-1914's.) About. George has totally restructured and if those were greatly raise the subjects that were tabled at that congressmilitary and especially maritime clergy, it is attracted a matter number of history prominent clerics. It should be noted, and emphasize his ability and the ability to select a very important matter talented assistants and keep firmly in their hands, those, different abilities were not always at a height in nature. From the clergy subordinate to him, he demanded thateveryone worked fully its forces and capabilities, but will certainly worked; negligent and stroptivyh he pursued and expelled. His kipuchey energy and skill to come to any good and useful case and bring it to the end, as well as their availability, responsiveness and willingness to come to the aid of everyone in need, he earned the love, respect and information trust him in a subordinate of about 5,000 people (during the war) clergy, which every Orthodox Christian today in 1917 at its All-Russian congress elected him his life Protopresbyter.  By the end of July 1914. George has prepared a right draft name to be informed the highest total reorganization of management and aware maritime military clergy. To carry out his he was not given. Gryanula war. George O. received the appointment in Stavku High-Chief. Further story ofhis life and work on. Im sure you agree that George tells himself to simply list the items attention of readers memoir. After the agenda end of civil war. George moved to Bulgaria. Here he first became an ordinary priest. Outstanding ability and talent on the bright predicant. George was soon rated as the Bulgarian church authorities and local universities. George O. was brought to the pedagogical work first as a teacher Sophia University, then as they werea professor of Theological [8], isFaculty of Sofia University, while he was zakonouchitelem and director of Russian grammar school.  George O. and was destined to survive the Second World War. I think is a neutral approach ''(iHe died rather quietly ugas 2 - October 1951.e Despite the fact that the death of Fr. "here is what what was proposed in 1923: 1 George could not inform all his friends, 2relatives and acquaintances, 3the news of the death of Fr. George razneslas with lightning speed, 4not only for Sofia,but also for the province. The funeral on. George attracted a huge number of people simply wanted to ashes beloved pastor and mentor.etc Outstanding organizational skills, teaching skills, independence of judgement, faithful to their convictions, combined in fact seven changes on. Georgia with remarkable humility in allhis personal life and habits. This modesty especially stay invisible when compared with the breadth of its aid near and far. These qualities about.)'' Not sure how else to word that part George Shavelskogo served as a source of itlegends, it which is what it is; some subjects such still in his lifetime became folded around his behalf.---- == The Reason You Make the Big Bucks == Fr. Andrew, as this particular exampleI noted on the main moderator page, may not be neutral in themselvesthe Liturgy of St. Tikhon article needs moderation -- more than you provided. I'm offended at being equated with my attacker, and for us to attempt had you bothered to make them so or omit them risks read the error bulk of creating our own modern bias insteadthe post, you'd note I more than presented a risk every historian is aware ofthorough case for why my edits improved the article. The writing of history must IMO, the word "almost" should be impartialstruck from the record, whether but the historical facts in themselves are or arent impartial last time this same poster started three simultaneous edit-wars with me (Feb. 12-14), you threatened to ban us is another matterboth if we ever did it again. (There I agree that the source timeline that am getting blamed for ''responding'' again.) So, to avoid being banned by you, I located 'm asking you to do the information on would be NPOV/MCBmoderator's job, however as for read the background material about how the information AWRV has implemented all these in itselfactual fact (which you probably know already), it is either factual and (if you're convinced) strike the word "almost" from the article (or if not, let us know why not). You're a moderator, and I'm tired of being blamed for responding -- so have at it is isn't . :) --[[User:Willibrord|Willibrord]] 03:32, June 28, 2008 (fabricatedUTC):Thanks.I know how busy you must be with PLC coming up, but I appreciate your looking things over.--[[User:Willibrord|Willibrord]] 22:56, June 28, 2008 (UTC) Deacon Ben got in trouble for "responding"? He deleted an entire article of mine.(I put it back :) ) BTW, Father Andrew, THANK YOU for being objective and noting that a page titled "Western Rite and Old Calendarists" was about the Western Rite and Old Calendarists.in other words there I would love to review what "Willibrord" was no editing or personal opinions presented with "confirming"-- forgive my presumption but the man has an agenda. I wish I had the exact quote of Patriarch Elias of Antioch the first time he saw the "St Tikhon" liturgy: to paraphrase, he expressed surprised at an Orthodox liturgy that listnever once mentioned the Theotokos. --[[User:JosephSuaiden|JosephSuaiden]] 21:14, just July 18, 2008 (UTC) == Something the list North Got Right == "I'm a Southerner by birth and at heart, though I do wish there were more proper bakeries south of proposals in 1923 itself the Mason-Dixon Line. That's possibly one of the major things Yankees have gotten right." They didn't do too bad at emancipation or crop-burning, either. And --[[User:Willibrord|Willibrord]] 03:36, June 28, 2008 (UTC) == Wikipedia: article or version permalink == I remember seeing am curious as to why you changed the Wikipedia link back to the general article (for the [[Leo VI]] article). Since the Wikipedia page was listed as a similar list of items source, my understanding is that OrthodoxWiki prefers the version permalink (cf. [[OrthodoxWiki:Style Manual (Importing)]]); for external links (from not sources), I can understand using the interwiki for the 1923 congressgeneral Wikipedia article, but this one is a source. —[[User:Magda|<b>magda</b>]] ([[User_talk:Magda|talk]]) 16:22, July 1, 2008 (UTC) == Non-standard characters == I remember (so I hope this happened) years ago discussing on an OCA sitethe wiki the policy of using standard Latin characters for article names. However, which I cannot find nowany mention of this policy or any discussion about it. And so I checked the move log, and the only moves for "standard characters" are mine. Do you remember anything about this reason , or do you have thoughts on writing this up as a policy? (I believe think it is necessary and important 's a good idea to have this part included for non-standard characters within the complete article, and unbiased pictureas a redirect to the article.* As for the second section I had entered ) —[[User:Magda|<b>magda</b>]] (comparative study[[User_talk:Magda|talk]])22:06, July 1, which included 2008 (UTC) == "African Orthodox Chruch" ==Hi Fr Andrew :)I wanted to ask you about a link topic I just came across.... In the [[Time of Church History]] article, the entry for 1924 refers to a site : ''"..Bp. Daniel William Alexander convenes meeting in Kimberley, South Africa, which detailed things about Metaxakis' early Masonic involvement right down decides to his troubled death, yes it too did not come secede from the African Church (a MCB site, Protestant denomination) and that will need to be re-worked as you commented, perhaps affiliate with more research from other sourcesthe "African Orthodox Church" in New York under George McGuire; but it too presented disturbing details"'' Anyways, I accidentally came across a webpage that discusses the history of the [http://www.coltranechurch.org/african.htm "African Orthodox Church"], which in themselves were by nature * not neutral * (istating "The A.O.eC. if he attained 33rd degree in 1909 that's important; if he was buried with Masonic honours founded by George Alexander McGuire in 1935 that fact too 1921."  After reading this short summary, I am still not sure who this group is important),.. obsvioulsy non-canonical with mainstream Orthodoxy?? It is doubtful how much other written research exists So, should we have an article on this subjectgroup in the OW, for clarification purposes? Or at least in English. At any rate I appreciate the direction. Would be interested in what an article on George Alexander McGuire? What do you think. ?Cheers,

: This is answered on [[Talk:Church of Russia]]. As is noted in a number of our policy documents, we have our own taxonomy here, which often does not reflect official, legal names. The official OrthodoxWiki standard for all Orthodox churches is ''Church of [Place]''. This policy has been in effect pretty much since the wiki was founded in 2004. &mdash;[[User:ASDamick|<font size="3.5" color= Thanks and congrats "green" face="Adobe Garamond Pro, Garamond, Georgia, Times New Roman">Fr. Andrew</font>]] ^{[[User_talk:ASDamick|<font color="red">talk</font>]]} <small>[[Special:Contributions/ASDamick|<font color="black">contribs</font>]] <font face="Adobe Garamond Pro, Garamond, Georgia, Times New Roman">('''[[User:ASDamick/Wiki-philosophy|THINK!]]''')</font></small> 19:37, December 18, 2008 (UTC)::*I can perfectly see the logic behind such taxonomy and even accept it. But the point is, as i noted in my original edit comment, that such designation is not only formally incorrect, but in essence as well (by essence i mean the ecclesiological reasoning that obviously underpins your taxonomy). This is no more a Church of Russia than it is a Church of Ukraine (in fact, Ukraine could well lay a historically better grounded claim to it), or Latvia, for that matter. If one were to base the wording of the designation on the title of a Primate in question (which would be a legitimate thing to do within your taxonomy), the article would have to be called "Church of Moscow" (or "Church of Rus"). Paradoxically, you have chosen to employ the current official name of a country, which constitutes only a fraction (less than half by parish numbers) of the "canonical territory" of the ROC. How can you warrant that?[[User:Muscovite99|Max]] 20:00, December 22, 2008 (UTC)

Dear Father::: It's warranted with a combination of basic ecclesiology (i.e., the Church is not "Russian," "Greek, thank you for your friendly welcoming " etc., but it is the Church in and of a particular place&mdash;Russia, Greece, etc.) and congratulations for your ordination! --of English usage. ("Church of Russia" gets about 30,000 hits on Google.) It's notably the usage of such groups as the OCA[[Userhttp:Cat68|Cat68//www.oca.org/OCworldrussia.asp?SID=2]] 08:55, February 16etc. Of course its usage pales in comparison with "Russian Orthodox Church, 2007 " but that term is objectionable for the reasons previously noted. (PST"Church of Moscow" is a somewhat idiosyncratic term hardly ever used except in larger, translated phrases such as "Estonian Church of Moscow Patriarchate.")

Yes::: No matter what one names these articles, indeed, we have descendedthey'll not be satisfactory to all. This is what our policy here is. Our social ethics project policy has been, basically, to make sure that there were articles written use the city names for the ancient patriarchates but common country names for just about every article under the Ethics section. This newer autocephalous and autonomous churches (the exceptions are the OCA, which is the first phaseof somewhat irregular status, followed by a review by and the professorChurch of Sinai, after which you can expect changes to these articles (whether or not theydesignates a region). You've been worked on by other people in ll notice that this is consistently the mean time)case. [[User:Vandrona|Vandrona]]

::: Anyway, the proper place to discuss the names of articles is on the talk pages of the articles themselves. That way, everyone interested in working on the article can participate. Please direct future comments to [[Talk:Church of Russia]]. &mdash;[[User:ASDamick|<font size="3.5" color= Baby "green" face="Adobe Garamond Pro, Garamond, Georgia, Times New Roman">Fr. Andrew</font>]] ^{[[User_talk:ASDamick|<font color="red">talk</font>]]} <small>[[Special:Contributions/ASDamick|<font color="black">contribs</font>]] <font face="Adobe Garamond Pro, Garamond, Georgia, Times New Roman">('''[[User:ASDamick/Wiki-philosophy|THINK!]]''')</font></small> 21:25, December 22, 2008 (UTC)

Congratulations from I will be the Andronaches, as well. Magda also wants me first to add put UP my hand and say "WE NEED THAT GUY"! bet you never thought I would say that she approves of March births :) they way "sou vgazo glwssa oli tin wra" [[User:VandronaIxthis888|VandronaVasiliki]] 03:15:31, March 5December 19, 2007 2008 (PSTUTC)

Aww: Vasiliki, wow! it's not "we need ''that guy''," but rather I'm the Guy Who Says "Prove To Me That We Need That [article/addition/thing/etc.]." There is a reason why I wish you and especially your wife placed the best of luckhyphens where I did. You &mdash;[[User:ASDamick|<font size="3.5" color="green" face="Adobe Garamond Pro, Garamond, Georgia, Times New Roman">Fr. Andrew</font>]] ^{[[User_talk:ASDamick|<font color="red">talk</font>]]} <small>[[Special:Contributions/ASDamick|<font color="black">contribs</font>]] <font face="Adobe Garamond Pro, Garamond, Georgia, Times New Roman">('''[[User:ASDamick/Wiki-philosophy|THINK!]]'re going to have your hands full'')</font></small> 21:04, December 19, 2008 (UTC)::I give up ... Ijust wish you could not be so 'm surescholastic'with me some times and just ... lighten up :) I can't even imagine the responsibilityapologise in advance ... [[User:GabrielaIxthis888|GabrielaVasiliki]] 2013:3413, March 5December 20, 2007 2008 (PSTUTC)

::: Certainly, perhaps this level of reading and writing comprehension is not needed for everyday life (though I think it is!), but it surely is absolutely crucial when writing a reference work like an encyclopedia! Indeed, if being "scholastic" is needed anywhere, it's here. &mdash;[[User:ASDamick|<font size="3.5" color= Thanks "green" face="Adobe Garamond Pro, Garamond, Georgia, Times New Roman">Fr. Andrew</font>]] ^{[[User_talk:ASDamick|<font color="red">talk</font>]]} <small>[[Special:Contributions/ASDamick|<font color="black">contribs</font>]] <font face="Adobe Garamond Pro, Garamond, Georgia, Times New Roman">('''[[User:ASDamick/Wiki-philosophy|THINK!]]''')</font></small> 16:21, December 20, 2008 (UTC)

Thank == Timeline ==Hello Father, Eulogeite. First I wanted to wish you very warm Christmas wishes. Christ is born, Glorify Him! :)I wanted to ask if I can proceed and create the 10 sub-articles for the Timeline of Church History article (one sub-article for each of the 10 periods listed on the main article). Each sub-article would look exactly the same as the main article now does ,except that it would contain only the information for that particular era of course. I proposed a criterion on the talk page for helpwhat may be included on the reduced main timeline page; basically, if you agree and I can proceed to create the 10 sub-articles, with your blessing, and then shorten the remaining main article according to the criteria I attempted to set out, it would be great; I would emphasize that no information would be lost -- all the complete listings of the current timeline would remain on the 10-sub-articles. Or, I could create the 10-sub-rticles, and then you could do the final edit (reduction) of the main page then? Just an idea! Please let me know what you think! Cheers and Merry Christmas Father. Chris. :)[[User:DdpbfAngellight 888|DdpbfAngellight 888]] 1803:25, March 1003, 2007December 21,2008 (CETUTC)

==JulianDeletion of template==Ok, HEY - you deleted two templates so all the information on these is GONE! How do I get the information back? I admit my ignoranceknow you are the moderator/administrator but can you PLEASE just ONCE be kinder . Thanks for .. give me a 24 hour notice to MOVE the information????? Can you please resupply the stuff IN the infotemplates. [[User:GabrielaIxthis888|GabrielaVasiliki]] 1703:2300, March 12January 1, 2007 2009 (PDTUTC)

: It's not gone. I've noted on your Talk page where you can find it. &mdash;[[User:ASDamick|<font size="3.5" color= I Hope I'm Doing this Right "green" face="Adobe Garamond Pro, Garamond, Georgia, Times New Roman">Fr. Andrew</font>]] ^{[[User_talk:ASDamick|<font color="red">talk</font>]]} <small>[[Special:Contributions/ASDamick|<font color="black">contribs</font>]] <font face="Adobe Garamond Pro, Garamond, Georgia, Times New Roman">('''[[User:ASDamick/Wiki-philosophy|THINK!]]''')</font></small> 13:50, January 1, 2009 (UTC)

: There isn't one on the wiki. There are plenty of HTML tutorials elsewhere, though. &mdash;[[User:ASDamick|<font size="3.5" color="green" face="Adobe Garamond Pro, Garamond, Georgia, Times New Roman">Fr. Andrew</font>]] ^{[[User_talk:ASDamick|<font color="red">talk</font>]]} <small>[[Special:Contributions/ASDamick|<font color="black">contribs</font>]] <font face="Adobe Garamond Pro, Garamond, Georgia, Times New Roman">('''[[User:FrjohnwhitefordASDamick/Wiki-philosophy|FrjohnwhitefordTHINK!]] 16''')</font></small> 04:4120, March 18January 6, 2007 2009 (CDTUTC)

== See the above comments Ah you're a quick one! ==

I finally figured out the right wayNot bad--you got rid of my talk post in just less than 24 hours. My comments above were added Not bad...my hat's off to you sir! You have a longer route.gift for wiki-editing!{{unsigned|AmanUwellCant}}

: Inherently disruptive posts without any engagement regarding content are removed as a matter of form. &mdash;[[User:ASDamick|<font size="3.5" color="green" face="Adobe Garamond Pro, Garamond, Georgia, Times New Roman">Fr. Andrew</font>]] ^{[[User_talk:ASDamick|<font color= Versions of names "red">talk</font>]]} <small>[[Special:Contributions/ASDamick|<font color="black">contribs</font>]] <font face="Adobe Garamond Pro, Garamond, Georgia, Times New Roman">('''[[User:ASDamick/Wiki-philosophy|THINK!]]''')</font></small> 01:56, January 22, 2009 (UTC)

Bless father. I am asking wich versions of names I should to use? I was using Serbian versions, because == Thank U for the work you put in articles abut St. Sava, St. Nikolaj etc were used Serbian versions. Now I was told to use English versions. I am confused. Literature in english uses more often Serbian versions. [[User:Ddpbf|Ddpbf]] March 20, 17:24 (CET)==

It seams that ww == Antioch and the Armenians ==I have problems with inter wiki on serbian page. From English been to a canonical Antiochian church where they gave communion to Serbian it works good but problemArmenians .--How do they do this ? [[User:DdpbfEugene|DdpbfEugene]] 1020:2025, March 27January 23, 2007 2009 (PDTUTC)

: Is it a sin to be ethnically Armenian? Anyway, I cannot answer for what is done in a particular parish. Why not talk to the pastor? &mdash;[[User:ASDamick|<font size="3.5" color=images' deletion"green" face="Adobe Garamond Pro, Garamond, Georgia, Times New Roman">Fr. Andrew</font>]] ^{[[User_talk:ASDamick|<font color="red">talk</font>]]} <small>[[Special:Contributions/ASDamick|<font color="black">contribs</font>]] <font face="Adobe Garamond Pro, Garamond, Georgia, Times New Roman">('''[[User:ASDamick/Wiki-philosophy|THINK!]]''')</font></small> 22:44, January 23, 2009 (UTC)

Dear father your blessingAs in Armenian Apostolic.returning from Mt. Athos yesterday i found your notice about the deletion of my images because of tags' lack. i'm not at all familiar And he said that they were in communion with all them, that electronic-copyright-jargon and i'm not sure whether the corrections i did will work. i hope is why I'm not troubling asking you because you too much with my ignorance.may the Holy Week and Easter brings light in said on your family and to you personally.page that it's not possible [[User:Eugene|Eugene]] 23:49, January 23, 2009 (UTC)

yours/vassili: [[User:Vassilip|Vassilip]] 02:47, March 29, 2007 (PDT)The Armenian Apostolic church is not in communion with the Orthodox Patriarchate of Antioch. This is how my and all the bishops of our Archdiocese consistently answer when questioned on the topic.

yours indeed: I am a new user and could not find the detailed information about how to bring images from Wikimedia Commons to Orthodox Wiki. I would be very grateful if you could help. [[User:VassilipBag|VassilipBag]] 0521:0828, March 296, 2007 2009 (PDTUTC)

== Kallistos Ware Article titles ==

Hi, should I arrived at his article and was surprised to find that his elevation to Metropolitan had put the country name in the titles of my articles on churches (like Białystok, Poland)? They're already been updated. Kudoscathegorized as "Polish churches" so I don't think it's necessary.[[User:Bag|Bag]] 09:06, March 9, 2009 (UTC)

== Chrysostom ==Hello again, I looked at the St. John Chrysostom page, and thought that the St. John Chrysostom Oratorical Festival should be included. It would show that he has inspired children to orate the word of God to others, continuing in his footsteps. Since I have participated in the past and am in it again this year, I though it would be a good idea to mention it, and maybe put a link to the [[GOARCH]] website where they talk more about it and give more information. Tell me what you think! Thanks, --[[User:HellenicaIliada|HellenicaIliada]] 2018:5901, March 3116, 2007 2009 (PDTUTC)

: I've responded to your comment at [[Talk:John Chrysostom]]. In the future, you may wish to keep your comments limited only to the specific article in question. Posting it in multiple places is not in itself likely to gain notice. &mdash;[[User:ASDamick|<font size="3.5" color= Capthca for registration "green" face="Adobe Garamond Pro, Garamond, Georgia, Times New Roman">Fr. Andrew</font>]] ^{[[User_talk:ASDamick|<font color="red">talk</font>]]} <small>[[Special:Contributions/ASDamick|<font color="black">contribs</font>]] <font face="Adobe Garamond Pro, Garamond, Georgia, Times New Roman">('''[[User:ASDamick/Wiki-philosophy|THINK!]]''')</font></small> 01:36, March 19, 2009 (UTC)

I see you guys are having == Is WO a live forum of information or is it selective in the same problem as what I also want to deal with on our site. See: http://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Captcha_extensionsinformation it displays? ==

Christ Is Risen! Thank you very much, Father Andrew, for your kind wordsI myself am not involved on the dispute and have no intention of support to either side in this tragedy. Yours in Christ, --[[User:Arbible|Arbible]] 09:01, April 13, 2007 (PDT)

==Article Titles==Father Andrew,When I have been working on articles concerning Irene, wife of Leo IV, and Theodora, wife of Theophilus. originally viewed this page I am about ready was disheartened to post them on Orthodoxwiki, but I need good titles for observe the articleslack of information and that misleading information had been posted there. To avoid too much work establishing titles on the web, I've sought your opinion understand that this most likely had been posted by a user and as you have done so well in maintaining discipline of styles among all our articles. I find identifying many saints confusing with many of the saints having different titles applied such is not subject to themyour personal knowledge.

I notice that Wikipedia uses title conducted several days of their names investigation and a century when they lived, research in order to avoid similarities with other Irenes update the page appropriately and Theodoras. These seem bland, but I haven't found any Orthodox source on even went to the extent of seeking the web that provides distinct identification for these saints! I noticed in some edits you made authorisation to Orthodoxwiki articles that you seem to follow post the information from the Wikipedia practice. The Orthodox church sites haven't been any helpChurch and organisation, which they granted.

Following the practice of Theodora (Justinian's wife) does not appear reasonable for Irene or Theodora as their husbands were "Iconoclasts". For Irene, many if not a majority of the sites identify Irene as "Irene of Athens". I have been thinking of using find it offensive that you would label this work as a title for her. Another could be "Irene the Iconodule or Iconophile". For Theodora the Iconodule/iconophile would fit nicely“Heavily Point of View”.

Your comments I fail to understand why you would allow false and suggestions are solicitedmisleading information to remain posted. A young and inspired person chooses to update the page using only fact and you would rather support outdated and misinformed material.

In passing I notice Irene's feast day does not appear on the calendar of saints, August 9 . An Irene appears for August 13, but after some investiagation The general community that observed this saint appears to be a "Princess of Constantinople-tonsured Xenia with a date of 1124"page in its renewed form offered significant positive feedback. This confused me for a while!

::Thanks, Father. I think we are on the same path.[[User:Wsk|Wsk]] 18:13, April 15, 2007 (PDT)==?????Licensing==What is going on? I just noticed that you changed the license agreement from being able If persons should see fit to export add to not being able to export? Right after that information, I quoted it for the exports implore them to Wikipedia I did this morningdo so. What or who grants licensing for Orthodox wiki and how do I get in touch with them? Also what part makes the dual license incompatible and doesn't that violate using the wiki engine?[[User:LoveMonkey|LoveMonkey]] 13:02, April 24, 2007 (PDT)

: 1. The wiki engine has nothing Otherwise I believe that the page should be removed as it displays false and misleading information and if you should require I can have this formally requested from the community and association which this information refers to do with licensing. It's just a piece of software.?

: 2I can understand your removal of the Postal address and agree fairly to the emission of such information. All I just clarified ask is be fair in relation to the existing terms more explicitly, since I saw that there was some disagreement going on over at Wikipedia on content of the subject.post?

: 3. Licensing on OrthodoxWiki was defined by I am willing to build and develop the administration within page if you can suggest some points that would make the first year information less “Point of its inception. It is unlikely to be changed at this point, since so many edits here have been contributed under its terms. (This same message is being posted on your talk page.) &mdash;[[User:ASDamick|<font size="3.5" color="green" face="Adobe Garamond Pro, Garamond, Georgia, Times New Roman">Fr. Andrew</font>]] ^{[[User_talk:ASDamick|<font color="red">talk</font>]]} <small>[[Special:Contributions/ASDamick|<font color="black">contribs</font>]]</small> 14:10, April 24, 2007 (PDT)View”?

:[[User:Young_Serb|Young Serb]], I suspect that the conclusion of the original article (which was ''very'' POV) may have taken from the facts that were in play. In response to [[User:ASDamick|Fr Andrew]]'s request, I have taken the liberty of bringing the two together.:Please consider that, as a parish, the subject matter was dubiously noteworthy enough to place on OrthodoxWiki; as a parish that has now placed itself outside the Church, more so. This doesn't excuse incorrect information, of course; but if you consider that details are sparse, this may have been done for a reason - this is, conceptually, an encyclopaedia, and is therefore rather lacking in emotive speech and in minutiae. However, should you find the article to still be misleading, please correct it. &mdash; by [[User:Pistevo|<font color="green">Pιs</font><font color= Deletions "gold">τévο</font>]] ^{''[[User talk:Pistevo|<font color="blue">talk</font>]]'' ''[[User talk:Pistevo/dev/null|<font color="red">complaints</font>]]''} at 13:37, April 24, 2009 (UTC)

: Shadrac, Meshach, and Abednago are the Babylonian names of the Hebrew Hananiah (Ananias), Azariah (Azarias) and Mishael (Misael). &mdash;[[User:ASDamick|<font size="3.5" color=el"green" face="Adobe Garamond Pro, Garamond, Georgia, Times New Roman">Fr.orthodox.orgAndrew</font>]] ^{[[User_talk:ASDamick|<font color="red">talk</font>]]} <small>[[Special:Contributions/ASDamick|<font color="black">contribs</font>]] <font face="Adobe Garamond Pro, Garamond, Georgia, Times New Roman">('''[[User:ASDamick/Wiki-philosophy|THINK!]]''')</font></small> 23:14, April 25, 2009 (UTC)

Fistly, I'd like to thank you for your answer. Secondly, if I've undestood well your explanation, I should propose [[:el:User:kostisl]] appointed for host -if he wishes. He has already done excellent work on Orthodoxy in greek wikipedia, and he is == With the proper person I thing for this kind of job. I wish you the best--[[User:Kalogeropoulos|Kalogeropoulos]] 06:22, May 25, 2007 (PDT)feast! ==

== You dont like Proposed New Page?==Greetings Father. :) I wanted to ask your opinion about a new page I was thinking of adding. While researching some old books and resources for some of my articles, I found a number of puzzling abbreviations besides authors names, who were mostly Roman Catholic authors or scholars or from religious orders. Anyways, I found this list here: [http://www.fisheaters.com/religiousorderabbreviations.html Abbreviations of Religious Orders and Priestly Fraternitiies], and was thinking it would be a good reference page to add here, cataloged in a Roman catholic category perhaps. Just an idea, this info would help eliminate guesswork when people edit your articles!! ==going over historical documents. Cheers, [[User:Angellight 888|Angellight 888]] 23:59, July 8, 2009 (UTC)

Shame on you!! {{unsignedDelete please this error redirect [http://ru.orthodoxwiki.org/index.php?title=%D0%9A%D1%80%D0%B0%D1%82%D0%BA%D0%B8%D0%B9_%D0%BF%D1%80%D0%B0%D0%B2%D0%BE%D1%81%D0%BB%D0%B0%D0%B2%D0%BD%D1%8B%D0%B9_%D0%BB%D0%B5%D1%81%D0%B8%D0%BA%D0%BE%D0%BD&redirect=no] as recently created redirect page resulting from a typographical error. --[[User:Imerek|Fredthomzac}}Imerek]] 22:04, March 12, 2010 (UTC)

: Well, none of the articles on OrthodoxWiki are "my" articles. I presume this note is regarding the [[Church of Estonia]] article. I've addressed this both on your talk page and at the talk page for the article. &mdash;[[User:ASDamick|<font size="3.5" color="green" face="Adobe Garamond Pro, Garamond, Georgia, Times New Roman">Fr. Andrew</font>]] ^{[[User_talk:ASDamick|<font colorWhat is Orthodoxwiki?="red">talk</font>]]} <small>[[Special:Contributions/ASDamick|<font color="black">contribs</font>]]</small> 17:43, May 30, 2007 (PDT)

: See: [[OrthodoxWiki:Style_Manual#Types_of_Articles]]. &mdash;[[User:ASDamick|<font size="3.5" color= Greetings! "green" face="Adobe Garamond Pro, Garamond, Georgia, Times New Roman">Fr. Andrew</font>]] ^{[[User_talk:ASDamick|<font color="red">talk</font>]]} <small>[[Special:Contributions/ASDamick|<font color="black">contribs</font>]] <font face="Adobe Garamond Pro, Garamond, Georgia, Times New Roman">('''[[User:ASDamick/Wiki-philosophy|THINK!]]''')</font></small> 19:44, June 19, 2010 (UTC)

Dear ==New Template==Hello Fr. Andrew,Thank you for the warm greetings. I'll send your regards if ever I will meet him.:)

I had an idea to create a new template for [[User_talk:Angellight_888#New_Template|Orthodox Church and Roman Catholic Church history]], where the various ''shared or related'' historical themes, subjects and articles of both churches could be grouped together neatly in one pathfinder / template. I have come to realize that it is quite a daunting task, and I was hoping I could ask for your opinion on what I have worked out so far (see this [[User_talk:Angellight_888#New_Template|link]], on my talk-page). Many of the words or headings I have titled may need to be changed, and the focus tightened... I have used the word "history" rather than "relations" in the title, because it seems more appropriate and allows for the inclusion of links to relevant articles. I thought it would go nicely at the bottom of the [[Timeline of Orthodox Church and Roman Catholic relations]] article; including such templates as you know is a successful pattern over at Wikipedia, and this particular timeline is one place on OW where I think it would be useful, and allow for the elimination of "see also" links, and some "external links" at the same time. Whenever you may have time for a look it would be much appreciated, and feel free to go ahead and edit/change/correct/remove or add if you want to; I saved it on my talk page so I can work on it there until it is ready if we decide to keep it. Cheers and thanks, [[User:FilipinoAngellight 888|FilipinoAngellight 888]] 0300:1925, May 31October 3, 2007 2010 (PDTUTC)

: Done. &mdash;[[User:ASDamick|<font size="3.5" color="green" face="Adobe Garamond Pro, Garamond, Georgia, Times New Roman">Fr. Andrew wrote</font>]] ^{[[User_talk:ASDamick|<font color="red">talk</font>]]} <small>[[Special:Contributions/ASDamick|<font color="black">contribs</font>]] <font face="Adobe Garamond Pro, Garamond, Georgia, Times New Roman">('''[[User:HelloASDamick/Wiki-philosophy|THINK! I don]]'''t know if you know Archimandrite Philemon (Castro)</font></small> 23:54, but in case you doMay 30, I wanted to pass on greetings to him. He and I were in seminary together at St. Tikhon's for two years.2011 (UTC)

"The '''Episcopacy is currently vacant as of MarchA pleasure, 2007''' and may be abolished pending the decision of the Holy and Sacred Synod of Constantinople."[[User:JonathansCornerCom|JonathansCornerCom]] 22:51, August 17, 2011 (UTC)

==Directory==Hi Fr Andrew, I'm looking for responses for my proposal (to delete the parish directory pages for Australia) on http://orthodoxwiki.org/OrthodoxWiki:Administrators#Eliminating_directory_articles - your thoughts? &mdash; by [[User:Pistevo|<font color="green">Pιs</font><font color="gold">τévο</font>]] ^{''[[User talk:Pistevo|<font color="blue">talk</font>]]'' ''[[User MARCUS Revision as of 08talk:Pistevo/dev/null|<font color="red">complaints</font>]]''} at 19:5616, May 4January 31, 20072013 (HST)

Please see: [http://orthodoxwiki.org/index.php?title=Orthodox_Metropolitanate_of_Hong_Kong_and_Southeast_Asia&oldid=50808] User MARCUS Revision on May 04, 2007 in OMHKSEA "Episcopacy".Question ==

Can you please tell me how you managed to built this wonderful wiki? [[User:FilipinoReceptie123|FilipinoReceptie123]] 0919:4855, June 2July 18, 2007 2013 (PDTHST)

Fr. Andrew wrote:...and, in any event, it's just a comment on a talk page. It wasn't even incorporated into the articleme! :) &mdash;[[User:ASDamick|<font size="3. —Fr5" color="green" face="Adobe Garamond Pro, Garamond, Georgia, Times New Roman">Fr. Andrew </font>]] ^{[[User_talk:ASDamick|<font color="red">talk </font>]]} <small>[[Special:Contributions/ASDamick|<font color="black">contribs 05</font>]] <font face="Adobe Garamond Pro, Garamond, Georgia, Times New Roman">('''[[User:ASDamick/Wiki-philosophy|THINK!]]''')</font></small> 03:2450, May 30August 6, 2007 2013 (PDTHST)