interwiki, renameuser, Administrators
13,552
edits
Changes
m
In general, though, I think this whole topic is getting quite bloated on OrthodoxWiki. There is a See further comments at [[Talk:Category:Coptic interpretations of the Fourth Ecumenical Council|whole series of often ambiguously-named articles]] that have been produced here, and there's very little in the way of encyclopedic summary. Rather than include all these articles ''en masse'', I'd much rather have a single summary article for each side of the issue which includes external links. That, it seems to me, should be the goal. Perhaps these articles could be quoted appropriately in the summary articles. [[User:Arbible|ArbibleOriental Orthodox]], your tactic has often been to dump huge amounts of quoted material into discussions; perhaps you can shift your trajectory a bit to something much more focussed. As it stands now, the sheer amount of material we have on this topic here seems to me to be way, way out of proportion for the issue. OrthodoxWiki is not a repository for the debate (or lack thereof) over Chalcedon. {{User:ASDamick/sig}} 14:42, 3 November 2005 (CST)
→Tome of Leo link, etc.
Perhaps we could include an article critiquing OO Christology from the POV of Chalcedonian Christology, which could be linked from this template marker. Further, each article which includes this template should ideally include a section charting the Chalcedonian POV.
