Changes

::[[w:IANAL|IANAL and TINLA]], but for the legal side: facts about the monastery (or anything else) are a matter of public record; hence, no copyright issues. In this case, the ''way that it is expressed'' is subject to copyright because it was original and/or creative. Even with the necessary significant editing (not sure how much 'edit' there is in a 'significant', but anyway), it is necessary to acknowledge the source; this is standard practise in essays and articles and is mandatory by OW policy (I'm less sure about international law on this one). &mdash; edited by [[User:Pistevo|<font color="green">Pιs</font><font color="gold">τévο</font>]] at 03:26, August 3, 2006 (CDT)

::On another note - has this article, as it currently stands, been sufficiently changed? &mdash; edited by [[User:Pistevo|<font color="green">Pιs</font><font color="gold">τévο</font>]] ^{''[[User talk:Pistevo|<font color="blue">talk</font>]]'' ''[[User talk:Pistevo/dev/null|<font color="red">complaints</font>]]''} at 03:27, August 3, 2006 (CDT)