Difference between revisions of "Talk:Autocephaly"
m (→Grammar) |
|||
| Line 3: | Line 3: | ||
:It does seem to want to be in quotation marks, though, for ''status'': "on" is the status of the light switch. Is there a different way to phrase the sentence? {{User:Magda/sig}} 20:18, November 21, 2005 (CST) | :It does seem to want to be in quotation marks, though, for ''status'': "on" is the status of the light switch. Is there a different way to phrase the sentence? {{User:Magda/sig}} 20:18, November 21, 2005 (CST) | ||
| + | |||
| + | :: Yes, quite likely. I'm not at all in especially love with "Autocephaly is the status..." {{User:ASDamick/sig}} 20:22, November 21, 2005 (CST) | ||
Revision as of 02:22, November 22, 2005
Grammar
Using a noun as the subject of a sentence is perfectly acceptable, especially when that sentence is essentially a statement of definition. In this case, the first sentence answers the question, "What is autocephaly?" —Fr. Andrew talk contribs (THINK!) (B.A. English, NCSU, '01) 17:53, November 21, 2005 (CST)
- It does seem to want to be in quotation marks, though, for status: "on" is the status of the light switch. Is there a different way to phrase the sentence? —magda (talk) 20:18, November 21, 2005 (CST)
- Yes, quite likely. I'm not at all in especially love with "Autocephaly is the status..." —Fr. Andrew talk contribs (THINK!) 20:22, November 21, 2005 (CST)
