Jump to: navigation, search
no edit summary
::All this is, imho, getting away from the point - should the current controversy be posted on the St.Anthony's article page? ISTM that, given the lack of any externally verifiable evidence on either side, it would be best to post, both accusations and replies, first on the talk page to ensure neutrality (and then in the article after some time has passed). Unless others have superior ideas, of course -- {{User:Pistevo/sig}} 23:07, February 10, 2006 (CST)
::I think we shouldn't get too deep into the controversy on the main page - maybe just mention that some things are controversial, offer a list of issues, and include some links to both sides. That can be done in one paragraph + links. [[User:FrJohn|Fr. John]]
Bureaucrats, Check users, interwiki, oversight, renameuser, Administrators

Navigation menu