Difference between revisions of "Talk:Western Rite"

From OrthodoxWiki
Jump to: navigation, search
m
(Splitting up article)
Line 5: Line 5:
 
==Splitting up article==
 
==Splitting up article==
 
The article is getting huge, and y'all's good suggestions and plans would seem to make it even bigger.  Perhaps it should be transitioned into a general article with multiple sections, then each section having a "''Main article: [[Foo]]''" included at the top where [[Foo]] becomes the more detailed article on that subject.  --[[User:ASDamick|Rdr. Andrew]] 12:55, 9 Apr 2005 (EDT)
 
The article is getting huge, and y'all's good suggestions and plans would seem to make it even bigger.  Perhaps it should be transitioned into a general article with multiple sections, then each section having a "''Main article: [[Foo]]''" included at the top where [[Foo]] becomes the more detailed article on that subject.  --[[User:ASDamick|Rdr. Andrew]] 12:55, 9 Apr 2005 (EDT)
 +
 +
 +
==Lack of liturgical continuity==
 +
 +
Another thing this brings to mind is the note in the article on [[Daniel (Alexandrow) of Erie]] : "Also, simply doing his own extensive research on ancient rites came in useful during the elevation of Metropolitan Philaret in 1964. This was the first time the Russian Orthodox Church Outside Russia had elected a successor who was not a Metropolitan in episcopal rank, and inasmuch as the remainder bishops were of lesser rank themselves, many were unsure of the elevation in such a situation. However, thanks to the research of Bishop Daniel, who was yet a reader, the Synod of Bishops was able to essentially replicate the office of elevation of a Metropolitan as performed in 15th century Russia." - [[User:Aristibule|Aristibule]]

Revision as of 13:07, November 7, 2005


Splitting up article

The article is getting huge, and y'all's good suggestions and plans would seem to make it even bigger. Perhaps it should be transitioned into a general article with multiple sections, then each section having a "Main article: Foo" included at the top where Foo becomes the more detailed article on that subject. --Rdr. Andrew 12:55, 9 Apr 2005 (EDT)


Lack of liturgical continuity

Another thing this brings to mind is the note in the article on Daniel (Alexandrow) of Erie : "Also, simply doing his own extensive research on ancient rites came in useful during the elevation of Metropolitan Philaret in 1964. This was the first time the Russian Orthodox Church Outside Russia had elected a successor who was not a Metropolitan in episcopal rank, and inasmuch as the remainder bishops were of lesser rank themselves, many were unsure of the elevation in such a situation. However, thanks to the research of Bishop Daniel, who was yet a reader, the Synod of Bishops was able to essentially replicate the office of elevation of a Metropolitan as performed in 15th century Russia." - Aristibule