100
edits
Changes
no edit summary
I've reverted the working of the first paragraph because it conforms better to N.P.O.V. The content is basically the same. No doubt, there are many serious things to discuss here, but let's allow the facts to speak for themselves. [[User:FrJohn|Fr. John]]
:Is NPOV really what we're striving for? I thought that we had a definite and distinct point of view. Of course, this is not to say that we ought to be uncharitable in expressing it.[[User:Dogface|Dogface]] 10:33, March 1, 2006 (CST)
