Talk:Elizabeth the New Martyr

Source?

A stylistic question. The original article was imported from Wikipedia, and so that article is linked under source. The article now is quite a bit expanded and modified since then. Should we leave it listed in that way? Frjohnwhiteford 04:02, March 28, 2007 (PDT)

Yes, though if you like, a note can be added, such as "included material from original version." This is the essence of the license under which both Wikipedia and OrthodoxWiki material is released—that it may be copied and modified, so long as source credit is given. —Fr. Andrew ^talk contribs 04:10, March 28, 2007 (PDT)

I think such a note would be a good idea. How would you format that note? Frjohnwhiteford 04:12, March 28, 2007 (PDT)

I'll do it, as an example. —Fr. Andrew ^talk contribs 04:21, March 28, 2007 (PDT)

Two new images... problem

I guess the system doesn't like the fact that I used an "&" in the name of these files, because the links to the image don't work, and I don't know how to fix it.

I went ahead and reloaded the files without the "&". Someone should probably delete the other file names. Frjohnwhiteford 17:21, March 29, 2007 (PDT)

That's why we included that in the mass of text that's shown before you upload a file!  :) I now have to try to remember how we deleted files like this before... —Fr. Andrew ^talk contribs 19:03, March 29, 2007 (PDT)

But what real man reads instructions, when he can learn by trial and error.  :) Frjohnwhiteford 19:11, March 29, 2007 (PDT)