66
edits
Changes
→The Neopatristic Revival
: Please do not mix Fr. Florovsky with the reas to of the "team". Although, several of his stances were problematic, he was Orthodox theologian, apart and far from those that came out of Paris school. The "team" misused him, and now many think how he is part of the "team". He is not. [[User:Cebactokpatop|Cebactokpatop]] 20:12, May 7, 2008 (UTC)
:: On the contrary, Florovsky is united with Lossky, Schmemann, Meyendorff, Romanides, Yannaras and Zizioulas in calling for a return to patristic theology, rather than to continue with the religious philosophy of Bulgakov and Berdiaev, or to acquiesce in the redundant repetition of nineteenth-century Russian seminary theology (cf. Pomazansky's ''Orthodox Dogmatic Theology''). [[User:Seminarist|Seminarist]] 13:52, May 8, 2008 (UTC)
