Difference between revisions of "Talk:Conversion"

Latest revision as of 20:45, January 5, 2006

Should this article be expanded to include convert (the verb) and conversion? —magda (talk) 12:27, January 5, 2006 (CST)

I guess if there's material that can be well integrated, why not? It's quite sparse now. Fr. John

Revision as of 18:27, January 5, 2006 (view source) Magda (talk \| contribs) m (question)		Latest revision as of 20:45, January 5, 2006 (view source) Magda (talk \| contribs) m (Talk:Convert moved to Talk:Conversion)
(One intermediate revision by one other user not shown)
Line 1:		Line 1:
	Should this article be expanded to include ''convert'' (the verb) and ''conversion''? {{User:Magda/sig}} 12:27, January 5, 2006 (CST)		Should this article be expanded to include ''convert'' (the verb) and ''conversion''? {{User:Magda/sig}} 12:27, January 5, 2006 (CST)
		+
		+	:I guess if there's material that can be well integrated, why not? It's quite sparse now. [[User:FrJohn\|Fr. John]]