Difference between revisions of "Talk:Elizabeth the New Martyr"
(Two new images... problem) |
(→Two new images... problem) |
||
| Line 11: | Line 11: | ||
== Two new images... problem == | == Two new images... problem == | ||
| − | I guess the system doesn't like the fact that I used an "&" in the name of these files, because the links to the image don't work, and I don't know how to fix it. | + | I guess the system doesn't like the fact that I used an "&" in the name of these files, because the links to the image don't work, and I don't know how to fix it. |
| + | |||
| + | I went ahead and reloaded the files without the "&". Someone should probably delete the other file names. [[User:Frjohnwhiteford|Frjohnwhiteford]] 17:21, March 29, 2007 (PDT) | ||
Revision as of 00:21, March 30, 2007
Source?
A stylistic question. The original article was imported from Wikipedia, and so that article is linked under source. The article now is quite a bit expanded and modified since then. Should we leave it listed in that way? Frjohnwhiteford 04:02, March 28, 2007 (PDT)
- Yes, though if you like, a note can be added, such as "included material from original version." This is the essence of the license under which both Wikipedia and OrthodoxWiki material is released—that it may be copied and modified, so long as source credit is given. —Fr. Andrew talk contribs 04:10, March 28, 2007 (PDT)
- I think such a note would be a good idea. How would you format that note? Frjohnwhiteford 04:12, March 28, 2007 (PDT)
- I'll do it, as an example. —Fr. Andrew talk contribs 04:21, March 28, 2007 (PDT)
Two new images... problem
I guess the system doesn't like the fact that I used an "&" in the name of these files, because the links to the image don't work, and I don't know how to fix it.
I went ahead and reloaded the files without the "&". Someone should probably delete the other file names. Frjohnwhiteford 17:21, March 29, 2007 (PDT)
