Difference between revisions of "Talk:Elizabeth the New Martyr"
(Source?) |
(→Source?) |
||
| Line 2: | Line 2: | ||
A stylistic question. The original article was imported from Wikipedia, and so that article is linked under source. The article now is quite a bit expanded and modified since then. Should we leave it listed in that way? [[User:Frjohnwhiteford|Frjohnwhiteford]] 04:02, March 28, 2007 (PDT) | A stylistic question. The original article was imported from Wikipedia, and so that article is linked under source. The article now is quite a bit expanded and modified since then. Should we leave it listed in that way? [[User:Frjohnwhiteford|Frjohnwhiteford]] 04:02, March 28, 2007 (PDT) | ||
| + | |||
| + | : Yes, though if you like, a note can be added, such as "included material from original version." This is the essence of the license under which both Wikipedia and OrthodoxWiki material is released—that it may be copied and modified, so long as source credit is given. —[[User:ASDamick|<font size="3.5" color="green" face="Adobe Garamond Pro, Garamond, Georgia, Times New Roman">Fr. Andrew</font>]] <sup>[[User_talk:ASDamick|<font color="red">talk</font>]]</sup> <small>[[Special:Contributions/ASDamick|<font color="black">contribs</font>]]</small> 04:10, March 28, 2007 (PDT) | ||
Revision as of 11:10, March 28, 2007
Source?
A stylistic question. The original article was imported from Wikipedia, and so that article is linked under source. The article now is quite a bit expanded and modified since then. Should we leave it listed in that way? Frjohnwhiteford 04:02, March 28, 2007 (PDT)
- Yes, though if you like, a note can be added, such as "included material from original version." This is the essence of the license under which both Wikipedia and OrthodoxWiki material is released—that it may be copied and modified, so long as source credit is given. —Fr. Andrew talk contribs 04:10, March 28, 2007 (PDT)
