Difference between revisions of "Talk:Nicholas (Manovitch)"

From OrthodoxWiki
Jump to: navigation, search
Line 1: Line 1:
 
Information provided in the form of jottings by the archivist of the Russian Orthodox Australian Diocese, Archpriest Michael Protopopov, Dandenong, who is about to publish a book on the history of the Russian Australian Diocese which will provide a better written paragraph on Fr Nicholas Manovitch.
 
Information provided in the form of jottings by the archivist of the Russian Orthodox Australian Diocese, Archpriest Michael Protopopov, Dandenong, who is about to publish a book on the history of the Russian Australian Diocese which will provide a better written paragraph on Fr Nicholas Manovitch.
 
:Forgive me if I'm merely restating the obvious, but the cleanup tag is not used for bad information, just for bad arrangement.  A number of articles (ones taken from Wikipedia come to mind, but most blurb biographies also have that problem) have to have a cleanup tag attached to them because they just don't fit the style.  {{User:Pistevo/sig}} 08:16, May 18, 2006 (CDT)
 
:Forgive me if I'm merely restating the obvious, but the cleanup tag is not used for bad information, just for bad arrangement.  A number of articles (ones taken from Wikipedia come to mind, but most blurb biographies also have that problem) have to have a cleanup tag attached to them because they just don't fit the style.  {{User:Pistevo/sig}} 08:16, May 18, 2006 (CDT)
 +
 +
: I've standardized the article a bit.  It's more than a stub, but something less than thorough.  I wonder about the preferred spelling of his surname, though, and whether he was a monastic (since the surname is given in parentheses).  {{User:ASDamick/sig}} 08:54, May 18, 2006 (CDT)

Revision as of 13:54, May 18, 2006

Information provided in the form of jottings by the archivist of the Russian Orthodox Australian Diocese, Archpriest Michael Protopopov, Dandenong, who is about to publish a book on the history of the Russian Australian Diocese which will provide a better written paragraph on Fr Nicholas Manovitch.

Forgive me if I'm merely restating the obvious, but the cleanup tag is not used for bad information, just for bad arrangement. A number of articles (ones taken from Wikipedia come to mind, but most blurb biographies also have that problem) have to have a cleanup tag attached to them because they just don't fit the style. — by Pιsτévο talk complaints at 08:16, May 18, 2006 (CDT)
I've standardized the article a bit. It's more than a stub, but something less than thorough. I wonder about the preferred spelling of his surname, though, and whether he was a monastic (since the surname is given in parentheses). —Fr. Andrew talk contribs (THINK!) 08:54, May 18, 2006 (CDT)