View source for Talk:Primacy and Unity in Orthodox Ecclesiology

Does anyone else have a problem with the fact that Metropolitan Zizioulas is quoted in the opening line of this article? [[User:Ixthis888|Vasiliki]]

No. He is both one of the leading Orthodox theologians of our day, but also one who has written a good deal on ecclesiology and primary. --[[User:Fr Lev|Fr Lev]] 00:12, April 13, 2009 (UTC)

==Edits - Adam A.J. DeVille & Brian E. Daley==
Seems like the author, Adam A.J. DeVille, is modifying this article to sell his book!!! [[User:Wsk|Wsk]] 13:33, May 16, 2011 (UTC)  Reverted to my original text - whoever is the vandal.  Don't put words in my mouth - change your own script!![[User:Wsk|Wsk]] 01:15, June 5, 2011 (UTC)

:Yes I agree it seems to be something like that.
		
:The following edit should be reversed:

::'' "Daley demolishes the usual nonsense about 'primacy of honor' meaning the primate is a toothless titular smiling beningly and impotently over the Church."''

:This statement, referring to RC theologian [[w:Brian E. Daley|Brian E. Daley]], reflects an obvious RC bias without directly identifying or providing any explanation or substantiation from the source itself, and is therefore against the [[OrthodoxWiki:Style Manual (Point of View)|OW Style Manual]]. Daley's article can certainly be listed in the bibliography, or quoted from directly, however free editorializing such as this should be removed.
	
: Also, on a point of reference, '''[http://www.sf.edu/sf/arts-sciences/philosophy/philosophy-theology-faculty/deville Dr. Adam DeVille], is a [http://www.sheptytskyinstitute.ca/?p=1497 subdeacon of the Ukrainian Catholic Church], even though the publisher calls him an “Orthodox” theologian!!!'''

: In general I think that both sources should be listed in the article, but I would reverse all of the particular edits that were done here. [[User:Angellight 888|Angellight 888]] 14:43, May 16, 2011 (UTC)