View source for Talk:Elizabeth the New Martyr

== Source? ==

A stylistic question.  The original article was imported from Wikipedia, and so that article is linked under source.  The article now is quite a bit expanded and modified since then.  Should we leave it listed in that way? [[User:Frjohnwhiteford|Frjohnwhiteford]] 04:02, March 28, 2007 (PDT)

: Yes, though if you like, a note can be added, such as "included material from original version."  This is the essence of the license under which both Wikipedia and OrthodoxWiki material is released&mdash;that it may be copied and modified, so long as source credit is given.  &mdash;[[User:ASDamick|<font size="3.5" color="green" face="Adobe Garamond Pro, Garamond, Georgia, Times New Roman">Fr. Andrew</font>]] <sup>[[User_talk:ASDamick|<font color="red">talk</font>]]</sup> <small>[[Special:Contributions/ASDamick|<font color="black">contribs</font>]]</small> 04:10, March 28, 2007 (PDT)

:: I think such a note would be a good idea.  How would you format that note?  [[User:Frjohnwhiteford|Frjohnwhiteford]] 04:12, March 28, 2007 (PDT)

::: I'll do it, as an example.  &mdash;[[User:ASDamick|<font size="3.5" color="green" face="Adobe Garamond Pro, Garamond, Georgia, Times New Roman">Fr. Andrew</font>]] <sup>[[User_talk:ASDamick|<font color="red">talk</font>]]</sup> <small>[[Special:Contributions/ASDamick|<font color="black">contribs</font>]]</small> 04:21, March 28, 2007 (PDT)

== Two new images... problem ==

I guess the system doesn't like the fact that I used an "&" in the name of these files, because the links to the image don't work, and I don't know how to fix it. 

I went ahead and reloaded the files without the "&".  Someone should probably delete the other file names.  [[User:Frjohnwhiteford|Frjohnwhiteford]] 17:21, March 29, 2007 (PDT)