7
edits
Changes
→Non Wiki question
:: There is no indication in any of the wiki's logs that this page existed before it was created by [[User:JulianDelphiki|JulianDelphiki]] on Jan. 1st. —[[User:ASDamick|<font size="3.5" color="green" face="Adobe Garamond Pro, Garamond, Georgia, Times New Roman">Fr. Andrew</font>]] <sup>[[User_talk:ASDamick|<font color="red">talk</font>]]</sup> <small>[[Special:Contributions/ASDamick|<font color="black">contribs</font>]]</small> 14:39, January 18, 2008 (PST)
==Disputed Objectivity==
The good Fr. says that he deleted the article b/c there were no sources. However, the article put in its place is entirely one-sided and represents purely the party line on the matter, and does not take into account any of the immense wealth of contrary material available to anyone w. a few minutes to kill. The current article, frozen, as it were, is dishonest. He and his matushka call the original post a pack of lies, but it was nothing of the sort. This version is, however, just that. Is the Orthodox Wiki an arm of the Antiochian Archdiocese? It certainly has seemed to present only the AOA's historiographical view. It could have presented, as an honest historian would, that there is more than one historiographical frame of reference. That is the expected behavior for a wiki encyclopedia and works quite well. You give space to more than one viewpoint on something this controversial. Freezing it with the party line like this is shameful. Very well, then. Updates will be provided over time at the [http://benlomond.wordpress.com Online Ben Lomond Archive]. Orthodox Wiki can represent the AOA version, and the another version will be presented elsewhere. It's a shame collaboration isn't possible. Sickening.
==Non Wiki question ==