427
edits
Changes
why?
:Because of successive blankings (without explanation), I'm protecting this article for the time being. People may make suggestions on the talk page. Thanks {{User:FrJohn/sig}}
With all due respect, this protection is unfair. Every Old Calendarist jurisdiction on this Wiki (a) has a clarificiation stating that they are not in communion with official Orthodoxy and (b) is open to criticism and does not require protection. HOCNA certainly doesn't require protection; its leaders are as open to question as any other Old Calendarist group. This block will give the unintended appearance of favor. As someone who cleans up "soi-disant" off of Bishops from jurisdictions not my own, this gives HOCNA a "quasi-official" status on the Wiki. They have no listed history, and thus do not have to explain the fairly recent genesis of their Church (1986) as has every other Old Calendarist synod on the Wiki.--[[User:JosephSuaiden|JosephSuaiden]] 23:49, December 18, 2008 (UTC)
==Edits==