This article would be better titled "Criticism of the OSB" as it stands right now. The second quoted criticism is also from a review of the original OSB, which differs significantly from the current version. I think these articles should be linked in a section of links to reviews critical of the OSB, and this section should be significantly condensed to a one paragraph summary. [[User:Frjohnwhiteford|Frjohnwhiteford]] 15:59, February 5, 2011 (UTC)

:I agree. Calling three random bloggers, none of whom have the CV to really be notable, "representative of most of the reviews" is a stretch at best and outright dishonest at worst. And the quotes are far too long, while the actual endorsements by hierarchs are glossed over. The anti-convert attitude of the last quote is especially beyond the pale. I removed the entire section. [[User:Oknazevad|Oknazevad]] ([[User talk:Oknazevad|talk]]) 07:42, September 18, 2025 (UTC)