Difference between revisions of "User talk:Magda"
(→Categorizing hierarchs) |
|||
| Line 27: | Line 27: | ||
:''Your patent answers (which I never seem to think of) are why I keep asking you questions.'' | :''Your patent answers (which I never seem to think of) are why I keep asking you questions.'' | ||
: And here I thought that I was just a curmudgeon who liked things his own way. :) {{User:ASDamick/sig}} 10:54, January 6, 2006 (CST) | : And here I thought that I was just a curmudgeon who liked things his own way. :) {{User:ASDamick/sig}} 10:54, January 6, 2006 (CST) | ||
| + | |||
| + | ==Uninhabited!== | ||
| + | I agree, Magda. In my mind I had questioned their inclusion in the template from the start. And their listing only added unecessary length to the "wanted" list, but after a while I didn't see them being removed. So, my attempt to remove them by writing articles!!! Please remove them. I didn't want to removed them unilaterally. [[User:Wsk|Wsk]] 06:35, January 8, 2006 (CST) | ||
Revision as of 12:35, January 8, 2006
Contents
Nativity series
Sounds great, but what did you have in mind? (Or were you hoping I'd provide that?) :) —Fr. Andrew talk contribs (THINK!) 14:24, December 23, 2005 (CST)
V's Cardbox
Could we imply that you are endorsing/advising readers to buy with confidence from these suppliers? (There are many more, but I am not sure what the rules are? Do they need to pay to you first to be listed?). ER
New Martyrs
I'm actively putting together a separate article at this moment! :) —Fr. Andrew talk contribs (THINK!) 15:35, January 3, 2006 (CST)
Searching
Yeah, I've noticed that sort of thing before, too, both here and on Wikipedia. I don't understand it. :/ —Fr. Andrew talk contribs (THINK!) 08:40, January 4, 2006 (CST)
Categorizing hierarchs
I don't completely understand all the options you gave, but...
My preference is for there to be individual articles titled "List of Xes of Y," where "Xes" is the highest rank for that see, e.g., List of Patriarchs of Constantinople which lists all bishops of Byzantium/Constantinople, no matter their rank. The category would be included in all articles about those bishops, and the "List of" article would also be included in the category. —Fr. Andrew talk contribs (THINK!) 19:28, January 5, 2006 (CST)
- Your patent answers (which I never seem to think of) are why I keep asking you questions.
- And here I thought that I was just a curmudgeon who liked things his own way. :) —Fr. Andrew talk contribs (THINK!) 10:54, January 6, 2006 (CST)
Uninhabited!
I agree, Magda. In my mind I had questioned their inclusion in the template from the start. And their listing only added unecessary length to the "wanted" list, but after a while I didn't see them being removed. So, my attempt to remove them by writing articles!!! Please remove them. I didn't want to removed them unilaterally. Wsk 06:35, January 8, 2006 (CST)
