Difference between revisions of "User talk:Joe Rodgers"
Joe Rodgers (talk | contribs) |
Joe Rodgers (talk | contribs) m (date error) |
||
Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
− | |||
== [[Deanery]] == | == [[Deanery]] == | ||
Line 5: | Line 4: | ||
Were you aware that your source (La Crosse) is Roman Catholic? I don't know whether it makes any difference in the definition of a deanery, but I thought I should point it out anyway. {{User:Magda/sig}} 07:41, January 19, 2006 (CST) | Were you aware that your source (La Crosse) is Roman Catholic? I don't know whether it makes any difference in the definition of a deanery, but I thought I should point it out anyway. {{User:Magda/sig}} 07:41, January 19, 2006 (CST) | ||
− | :Yes I was. I am certainly not against Catholic, Protestant, or anything for that matter, when it coincides with truth. I was not able to find a reasonable online source from an Orthodox perspective and thought that these words were appropriate for Orthodox deaneries as well. [[User:Joe Rodgers|Joe]] | + | :Yes I was. I am certainly not against Catholic, Protestant, or anything for that matter, when it coincides with truth. I was not able to find a reasonable online source from an Orthodox perspective and thought that these words were appropriate for Orthodox deaneries as well. [[User:Joe Rodgers|Joe]] 20060119 |
Revision as of 17:54, January 19, 2006
Deanery
Were you aware that your source (La Crosse) is Roman Catholic? I don't know whether it makes any difference in the definition of a deanery, but I thought I should point it out anyway. —magda (talk) 07:41, January 19, 2006 (CST)
- Yes I was. I am certainly not against Catholic, Protestant, or anything for that matter, when it coincides with truth. I was not able to find a reasonable online source from an Orthodox perspective and thought that these words were appropriate for Orthodox deaneries as well. Joe 20060119