Changes

Jump to: navigation, search

User talk:ASDamick

2,103 bytes added, 09:11, April 24, 2009
Is WO a live forum of information or is it selective in the information it displays?: new section
: I've responded to your comment at [[Talk:John Chrysostom]]. In the future, you may wish to keep your comments limited only to the specific article in question. Posting it in multiple places is not in itself likely to gain notice. &mdash;[[User:ASDamick|<font size="3.5" color="green" face="Adobe Garamond Pro, Garamond, Georgia, Times New Roman">Fr. Andrew</font>]] <sup>[[User_talk:ASDamick|<font color="red">talk</font>]]</sup> <small>[[Special:Contributions/ASDamick|<font color="black">contribs</font>]] <font face="Adobe Garamond Pro, Garamond, Georgia, Times New Roman">('''[[User:ASDamick/Wiki-philosophy|THINK!]]''')</font></small> 01:36, March 19, 2009 (UTC)
 
== Is WO a live forum of information or is it selective in the information it displays? ==
 
This post refers to your changes in the page;
 
St. George Free Serbian Orthodox Church (Forrest, Australian Capital Territory)
 
I myself am not involved on the dispute and have no intention of support to either side in this tragedy.
 
When I originally viewed this page I was disheartened to observe the lack of information and that misleading information had been posted there. I understand that this most likely had been posted by a user and as such is not subject to your personal knowledge.
 
I conducted several days of investigation and research in order to update the page appropriately and even went to the extent of seeking the authorisation to post the information from the Church and organisation, which they granted.
 
I find it offensive that you would label this work as “Heavily Point of View”.
 
I fail to understand why you would allow false and misleading information to remain posted. A young and inspired person chooses to update the page using only fact and you would rather support outdated and misinformed material.
 
The general community that observed this page in its renewed form offered significant positive feedback.
 
I will stand corrected if you can show me grounds for your dismissal of my updates to this page? I can provide you with factual record and account of all the information I had posted on that page and request that it be allowed to remain.
 
If persons should see fit to add to that information, I implore them to do so.
 
Otherwise I believe that the page should be removed as it displays false and misleading information and if you should require I can have this formally requested from the community and association which this information refers to?
 
I can understand your removal of the Postal address and agree fairly to the emission of such information. All I ask is be fair in relation to the content of the post?
 
I am willing to build and develop the page if you can suggest some points that would make the information less “Point of View”?
 
Young Serb
12
edits

Navigation menu