Difference between revisions of "Talk:Jesus Christ"

From OrthodoxWiki
Jump to: navigation, search
(Oriental Orthodox variation)
Line 1: Line 1:
 
==Oriental Orthodox variation==
 
==Oriental Orthodox variation==
 
Hi, I wanted to add the little paragraph (although it  might appear repetitive) because I thought it is important just to show the difference on how we see Christ differently. The article is about Jesus Christ so whilst we SEE him with Hypostatic Union they dont ... I was wondering if it was better headed as Hypostatic Union? what are some peoples thoughts? Im not a theology expert so feedback would be great. PS. I didnt want the paragraph to turn into a theological debate between the two that is not the purpose so I would ask from people refraining to resolve the issue in this article ... [[User:Ixthis888|Vasiliki]] 01:47, April 24, 2009 (UTC)
 
Hi, I wanted to add the little paragraph (although it  might appear repetitive) because I thought it is important just to show the difference on how we see Christ differently. The article is about Jesus Christ so whilst we SEE him with Hypostatic Union they dont ... I was wondering if it was better headed as Hypostatic Union? what are some peoples thoughts? Im not a theology expert so feedback would be great. PS. I didnt want the paragraph to turn into a theological debate between the two that is not the purpose so I would ask from people refraining to resolve the issue in this article ... [[User:Ixthis888|Vasiliki]] 01:47, April 24, 2009 (UTC)
 +
 +
The Church uses the technical term Hypostatic Union (Υποστατική Ένωσις), and so it is not out of place in the article.
 +
Peter

Revision as of 07:47, April 24, 2009

Oriental Orthodox variation

Hi, I wanted to add the little paragraph (although it might appear repetitive) because I thought it is important just to show the difference on how we see Christ differently. The article is about Jesus Christ so whilst we SEE him with Hypostatic Union they dont ... I was wondering if it was better headed as Hypostatic Union? what are some peoples thoughts? Im not a theology expert so feedback would be great. PS. I didnt want the paragraph to turn into a theological debate between the two that is not the purpose so I would ask from people refraining to resolve the issue in this article ... Vasiliki 01:47, April 24, 2009 (UTC)

The Church uses the technical term Hypostatic Union (Υποστατική Ένωσις), and so it is not out of place in the article. Peter