Difference between revisions of "Talk:Iconographers"

From OrthodoxWiki
Jump to: navigation, search
 
m
Line 1: Line 1:
 
I'm a little uncomfortable with the main body of this article being essentially an advertisement (probably cut and pasted, too).  I have no problem with something of a web directory being listed here, but unless we're talking about persons who would normally make it into an encyclopedia (e.g., [[Andrei Rublev]], [[Theophanes the Greek]] or [[Photios Kontoglou]]), I think perhaps no more than a link with a short explanation is really necessary.  Thoughts?  —[[User:ASDamick|{{User:ASDamick/sig}}]] 22:22, 16 Jun 2005 (EDT)
 
I'm a little uncomfortable with the main body of this article being essentially an advertisement (probably cut and pasted, too).  I have no problem with something of a web directory being listed here, but unless we're talking about persons who would normally make it into an encyclopedia (e.g., [[Andrei Rublev]], [[Theophanes the Greek]] or [[Photios Kontoglou]]), I think perhaps no more than a link with a short explanation is really necessary.  Thoughts?  —[[User:ASDamick|{{User:ASDamick/sig}}]] 22:22, 16 Jun 2005 (EDT)
 +
 +
: OK, I was thinking a little along these lines. I wasn't sure of the original intent of the article. I added the links I had because I saw this as more of a repository of links to buy modern icons. Anyone else? --[[User:Joe Rodgers|Joe Rodgers]] 23:46, 16 Jun 2005 (EDT)

Revision as of 03:46, June 17, 2005

I'm a little uncomfortable with the main body of this article being essentially an advertisement (probably cut and pasted, too). I have no problem with something of a web directory being listed here, but unless we're talking about persons who would normally make it into an encyclopedia (e.g., Andrei Rublev, Theophanes the Greek or Photios Kontoglou), I think perhaps no more than a link with a short explanation is really necessary. Thoughts? —[[User:ASDamick|—Fr. Andrew talk contribs (THINK!)]] 22:22, 16 Jun 2005 (EDT)

OK, I was thinking a little along these lines. I wasn't sure of the original intent of the article. I added the links I had because I saw this as more of a repository of links to buy modern icons. Anyone else? --Joe Rodgers 23:46, 16 Jun 2005 (EDT)