Difference between revisions of "Talk:Gibran (Ramlawey) of Australia and New Zealand"
m |
|||
| Line 4: | Line 4: | ||
: Googling for his name yields multiple sources referring to him as "archbishop" (including obituaries).[http://www.google.com/search?num=100&hl=en&lr=&safe=off&q=%22archbishop+gibran%22&btnG=Search] —[[User:ASDamick|{{User:ASDamick/sig}}]] 20:20, 11 Sep 2005 (EDT) | : Googling for his name yields multiple sources referring to him as "archbishop" (including obituaries).[http://www.google.com/search?num=100&hl=en&lr=&safe=off&q=%22archbishop+gibran%22&btnG=Search] —[[User:ASDamick|{{User:ASDamick/sig}}]] 20:20, 11 Sep 2005 (EDT) | ||
| − | :: this...is probably best described as 'frustrating' :). a bunch of external sources say 'archbishop', possibly because they are used to archbishops running the church. deanery of new zealand says 'bishop' in its obituary [http://www.antiochian.org.nz/spotlight/Spot99a.html], and archdiocese of aust/nz says 'bishop' in its history of the archdiocese [www.antiochian.org.au/archnews.html]. all that said, i'll change it only after this has been verified (either way) on an archdiocesan level. cheers, [[User:Pistevo|oea]] 01:50, 12 Sep 2005 (EDT) | + | :: this...is probably best described as 'frustrating' :). a bunch of external sources say 'archbishop', possibly because they are used to archbishops running the church. deanery of new zealand says 'bishop' in its obituary [http://www.antiochian.org.nz/spotlight/Spot99a.html], and archdiocese of aust/nz says 'bishop' in its history of the archdiocese [http://www.antiochian.org.au/archnews.html]. all that said, i'll change it only after this has been verified (either way) on an archdiocesan level. cheers, [[User:Pistevo|oea]] 01:50, 12 Sep 2005 (EDT) |
Revision as of 05:51, September 12, 2005
episcopal rank
i've seen no evidence that +Gibran was archbishop - all documents i've seen say that he was just bishop of a diocese, and that after his repose the diocese got upgraded to archdiocese and title of bishop to metropolitan. oea 02:30, 11 Sep 2005 (EDT)
- Googling for his name yields multiple sources referring to him as "archbishop" (including obituaries).[1] —[[User:ASDamick|—Fr. Andrew talk contribs (THINK!)]] 20:20, 11 Sep 2005 (EDT)
- this...is probably best described as 'frustrating' :). a bunch of external sources say 'archbishop', possibly because they are used to archbishops running the church. deanery of new zealand says 'bishop' in its obituary [2], and archdiocese of aust/nz says 'bishop' in its history of the archdiocese [3]. all that said, i'll change it only after this has been verified (either way) on an archdiocesan level. cheers, oea 01:50, 12 Sep 2005 (EDT)
