Difference between revisions of "Talk:Evangelicus of Tomis"
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
Should Diocletian be a link or not? I know there's no article as yet, but that's not what I mean. Clearly Diocletian was pagan but, like Nero, I'd argue that he is important to Orthodox history by reason of the fact that he initiated a vicious persecution of Christians. Is that sufficient reason to have an article on him? [[User:James|James]] 05:38, 22 Mar 2005 (CST) | Should Diocletian be a link or not? I know there's no article as yet, but that's not what I mean. Clearly Diocletian was pagan but, like Nero, I'd argue that he is important to Orthodox history by reason of the fact that he initiated a vicious persecution of Christians. Is that sufficient reason to have an article on him? [[User:James|James]] 05:38, 22 Mar 2005 (CST) | ||
| + | |||
| + | : Yeah, why not? --[[User:ASDamick|Rdr. Andrew]] 06:02, 22 Mar 2005 (CST) | ||
Revision as of 12:02, March 22, 2005
Should Diocletian be a link or not? I know there's no article as yet, but that's not what I mean. Clearly Diocletian was pagan but, like Nero, I'd argue that he is important to Orthodox history by reason of the fact that he initiated a vicious persecution of Christians. Is that sufficient reason to have an article on him? James 05:38, 22 Mar 2005 (CST)
- Yeah, why not? --Rdr. Andrew 06:02, 22 Mar 2005 (CST)
