Difference between revisions of "Talk:Evagrius Ponticus"
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
Would Evagrius be considered either a [[:Category:Church Fathers|Church Father]] or a [[:Category:Desert Fathers|Desert Father]]? Also, should the article be listed as ''Evagrius of Pontus'' or ''Evagrius Ponticus'', and the others be redirects, or should it stay as is? --[[User:Magda|magda]] 12:41, 2 May 2005 (CDT) | Would Evagrius be considered either a [[:Category:Church Fathers|Church Father]] or a [[:Category:Desert Fathers|Desert Father]]? Also, should the article be listed as ''Evagrius of Pontus'' or ''Evagrius Ponticus'', and the others be redirects, or should it stay as is? --[[User:Magda|magda]] 12:41, 2 May 2005 (CDT) | ||
| + | |||
| + | : 1. Both, likely. | ||
| + | |||
| + | : 2. "Evangrius Ponticus" is the form most common in scholarly English works, so that's what I'd name the article. | ||
| + | |||
| + | : --[[User:ASDamick|{{User:ASDamick/sig}}]] 21:49, 2 May 2005 (CDT) | ||
Revision as of 02:49, May 3, 2005
Would Evagrius be considered either a Church Father or a Desert Father? Also, should the article be listed as Evagrius of Pontus or Evagrius Ponticus, and the others be redirects, or should it stay as is? --magda 12:41, 2 May 2005 (CDT)
- 1. Both, likely.
- 2. "Evangrius Ponticus" is the form most common in scholarly English works, so that's what I'd name the article.
- --[[User:ASDamick|—Fr. Andrew talk contribs (THINK!)]] 21:49, 2 May 2005 (CDT)
