Difference between revisions of "Talk:Epitrachelion"
Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
''If a priest is simply attending a service, he wears no vestments'' Since the category provides information on "non-liturgical vestments," perhaps this should read ''wears no '''liturgical''' vestments''. It might also be helpful to note that, whether a celebrant or not, a priest will normally wear a cassock and cross. --[[User:Basil|Basil]] 05:45, 10 Jan 2005 (CST) | ''If a priest is simply attending a service, he wears no vestments'' Since the category provides information on "non-liturgical vestments," perhaps this should read ''wears no '''liturgical''' vestments''. It might also be helpful to note that, whether a celebrant or not, a priest will normally wear a cassock and cross. --[[User:Basil|Basil]] 05:45, 10 Jan 2005 (CST) | ||
+ | |||
+ | : I added the first note you suggested. I'm thinking that perhaps we should have an article named simply [[vestments]], moving most of what's in [[:Category:Vestments]] there. That way, the category can simply be mainly a list like other categories, and we can go into more depth regarding vestments themselves. I'll probably do that sometime tonight if there aren't objections. --[[User:ASDamick|Rdr. Andrew]] |
Latest revision as of 01:53, January 11, 2005
If a priest is simply attending a service, he wears no vestments Since the category provides information on "non-liturgical vestments," perhaps this should read wears no liturgical vestments. It might also be helpful to note that, whether a celebrant or not, a priest will normally wear a cassock and cross. --Basil 05:45, 10 Jan 2005 (CST)
- I added the first note you suggested. I'm thinking that perhaps we should have an article named simply vestments, moving most of what's in Category:Vestments there. That way, the category can simply be mainly a list like other categories, and we can go into more depth regarding vestments themselves. I'll probably do that sometime tonight if there aren't objections. --Rdr. Andrew