Difference between revisions of "Talk:Ecumenism"

From OrthodoxWiki
Jump to: navigation, search
m (Question)
 
Line 3: Line 3:
 
:It's partly there already, in my opinion, but no where near as developed as it probably should be for a topic of this significance.  Just make sure that it's all ''descriptive'' (e.g. some say this, others say that - try to attribute who says what, if possible).
 
:It's partly there already, in my opinion, but no where near as developed as it probably should be for a topic of this significance.  Just make sure that it's all ''descriptive'' (e.g. some say this, others say that - try to attribute who says what, if possible).
 
:Justification - as per [[OW:SM]], where there is controversy, OWiki is about ''describing'' the controversy - not in participating in the controversy, nor in being a battleground for controversy. &mdash; by [[User:Pistevo|<font color="green">Pιs</font><font color="gold">τévο</font>]] <sup>''[[User talk:Pistevo|<font color="blue">talk</font>]]'' ''[[User talk:Pistevo/dev/null|<font color="red">complaints</font>]]''</sup> at 12:06, November 2, 2008 (UTC)
 
:Justification - as per [[OW:SM]], where there is controversy, OWiki is about ''describing'' the controversy - not in participating in the controversy, nor in being a battleground for controversy. &mdash; by [[User:Pistevo|<font color="green">Pιs</font><font color="gold">τévο</font>]] <sup>''[[User talk:Pistevo|<font color="blue">talk</font>]]'' ''[[User talk:Pistevo/dev/null|<font color="red">complaints</font>]]''</sup> at 12:06, November 2, 2008 (UTC)
 +
::Hi, thanks heaps!! I am not interested in writing an article as I am not very strong in the English ... as some have pointed out (heheh) I was just interested in reading further about it. In Christ. [[User:Ixthis888|Vasiliki]] 21:57, November 2, 2008 (UTC)

Latest revision as of 21:57, November 2, 2008

Question

Can an Encyclopedic distinction be made between traditional Ecumenism and modern Ecumenism? A simple yes or no with a brief sentence by one of the Administrators will suffice without extensive debate/dialogue between 1000 people. Thanking you all in advance. - Vasiliki 02:48, October 30, 2008 (UTC)

It's partly there already, in my opinion, but no where near as developed as it probably should be for a topic of this significance. Just make sure that it's all descriptive (e.g. some say this, others say that - try to attribute who says what, if possible).
Justification - as per OW:SM, where there is controversy, OWiki is about describing the controversy - not in participating in the controversy, nor in being a battleground for controversy. — by Pιsτévο talk complaints at 12:06, November 2, 2008 (UTC)
Hi, thanks heaps!! I am not interested in writing an article as I am not very strong in the English ... as some have pointed out (heheh) I was just interested in reading further about it. In Christ. Vasiliki 21:57, November 2, 2008 (UTC)