Difference between revisions of "Talk:Ecumenism"
m (New page: ==Question== Can an '''Encyclopedic''' ''distinction'' be made between traditional Ecumenism and modern Ecumenism? A simple yes or no with a brief sentence by one of the Administrators wil...) |
|||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
==Question== | ==Question== | ||
Can an '''Encyclopedic''' ''distinction'' be made between traditional Ecumenism and modern Ecumenism? A simple yes or no with a brief sentence by one of the Administrators will suffice without extensive debate/dialogue between 1000 people. Thanking you all in advance. - [[User:Ixthis888|Vasiliki]] 02:48, October 30, 2008 (UTC) | Can an '''Encyclopedic''' ''distinction'' be made between traditional Ecumenism and modern Ecumenism? A simple yes or no with a brief sentence by one of the Administrators will suffice without extensive debate/dialogue between 1000 people. Thanking you all in advance. - [[User:Ixthis888|Vasiliki]] 02:48, October 30, 2008 (UTC) | ||
| + | :It's partly there already, in my opinion, but no where near as developed as it probably should be for a topic of this significance. Just make sure that it's all ''descriptive'' (e.g. some say this, others say that - try to attribute who says what, if possible). | ||
| + | :Justification - as per [[OW:SM]], where there is controversy, OWiki is about ''describing'' the controversy - not in participating in the controversy, nor in being a battleground for controversy. — by [[User:Pistevo|<font color="green">Pιs</font><font color="gold">τévο</font>]] <sup>''[[User talk:Pistevo|<font color="blue">talk</font>]]'' ''[[User talk:Pistevo/dev/null|<font color="red">complaints</font>]]''</sup> at 12:06, November 2, 2008 (UTC) | ||
Revision as of 12:06, November 2, 2008
Question
Can an Encyclopedic distinction be made between traditional Ecumenism and modern Ecumenism? A simple yes or no with a brief sentence by one of the Administrators will suffice without extensive debate/dialogue between 1000 people. Thanking you all in advance. - Vasiliki 02:48, October 30, 2008 (UTC)
- It's partly there already, in my opinion, but no where near as developed as it probably should be for a topic of this significance. Just make sure that it's all descriptive (e.g. some say this, others say that - try to attribute who says what, if possible).
- Justification - as per OW:SM, where there is controversy, OWiki is about describing the controversy - not in participating in the controversy, nor in being a battleground for controversy. — by Pιsτévο talk complaints at 12:06, November 2, 2008 (UTC)
