Difference between revisions of "Talk:Biblical Odes"
m |
|||
| Line 2: | Line 2: | ||
:There is a distinction between a canon, and the Biblical Odes. In most parishes and monasteries, we typically only do one biblical ode -- the 9th one, and on great feasts, even that is not done. The canon is always done. [[User:Frjohnwhiteford|Frjohnwhiteford]] 03:43, August 21, 2007 (PDT) | :There is a distinction between a canon, and the Biblical Odes. In most parishes and monasteries, we typically only do one biblical ode -- the 9th one, and on great feasts, even that is not done. The canon is always done. [[User:Frjohnwhiteford|Frjohnwhiteford]] 03:43, August 21, 2007 (PDT) | ||
| + | |||
| + | ::Then do we need to have the section in the [[Canon (hymn)]] article, or would it be better to have it refer to this article? —[[User:Magda|<b>magda</b>]] ([[User_talk:Magda|talk]]) 10:33, August 21, 2007 (PDT) | ||
Revision as of 17:33, August 21, 2007
Does this need its own article? There's a redundancy with a section of Canon (hymn). —magda (talk) 18:26, August 20, 2007 (PDT)
- There is a distinction between a canon, and the Biblical Odes. In most parishes and monasteries, we typically only do one biblical ode -- the 9th one, and on great feasts, even that is not done. The canon is always done. Frjohnwhiteford 03:43, August 21, 2007 (PDT)
- Then do we need to have the section in the Canon (hymn) article, or would it be better to have it refer to this article? —magda (talk) 10:33, August 21, 2007 (PDT)
