Difference between revisions of "Talk:Archbishop of Canterbury"
| Line 8: | Line 8: | ||
: In case I wasn't clear, I was advising that the list be ordered with the earliest dates at the top, descending to the later dates (which is the same as other chronological lists in OrthodoxWiki articles). Thus, you'd have St. Augustine of Canterbury first, with Archbishop Rowan Williams last. --[[User:ASDamick|Rdr. Andrew]] 19:36, 7 Feb 2005 (CST) | : In case I wasn't clear, I was advising that the list be ordered with the earliest dates at the top, descending to the later dates (which is the same as other chronological lists in OrthodoxWiki articles). Thus, you'd have St. Augustine of Canterbury first, with Archbishop Rowan Williams last. --[[User:ASDamick|Rdr. Andrew]] 19:36, 7 Feb 2005 (CST) | ||
| + | |||
| + | Okay. Done. | ||
Revision as of 02:11, February 8, 2005
Would it perhaps make more sense to reverse the order of these lists, so that the earlier archbishops are on the top of the list, and the later ones at the bottom? --Rdr. Andrew 11:55, 7 Feb 2005 (CST)
I think it would be best to have a consecutive list with three subdivisions as opposed to three somewhat disjointed lists. (In other words, yes.) --magda 13:57, 7 Feb 2005 (CST)
Is that better? --magda 14:30, 7 Feb 2005 (CST)
Okay. I'll work on that. -- Joffridus
- In case I wasn't clear, I was advising that the list be ordered with the earliest dates at the top, descending to the later dates (which is the same as other chronological lists in OrthodoxWiki articles). Thus, you'd have St. Augustine of Canterbury first, with Archbishop Rowan Williams last. --Rdr. Andrew 19:36, 7 Feb 2005 (CST)
Okay. Done.
