Difference between revisions of "Talk:Archbishop of Canterbury"
m |
|||
| Line 2: | Line 2: | ||
I think it would be best to have a consecutive list with three subdivisions as opposed to three somewhat disjointed lists. (In other words, yes.) --[[User:Magda|magda]] 13:57, 7 Feb 2005 (CST) | I think it would be best to have a consecutive list with three subdivisions as opposed to three somewhat disjointed lists. (In other words, yes.) --[[User:Magda|magda]] 13:57, 7 Feb 2005 (CST) | ||
| + | |||
| + | Is that better? --[[User:Magda|magda]] 14:30, 7 Feb 2005 (CST) | ||
Revision as of 20:30, February 7, 2005
Would it perhaps make more sense to reverse the order of these lists, so that the earlier archbishops are on the top of the list, and the later ones at the bottom? --Rdr. Andrew 11:55, 7 Feb 2005 (CST)
I think it would be best to have a consecutive list with three subdivisions as opposed to three somewhat disjointed lists. (In other words, yes.) --magda 13:57, 7 Feb 2005 (CST)
Is that better? --magda 14:30, 7 Feb 2005 (CST)
