Difference between revisions of "Talk:Apostolos"

From OrthodoxWiki
Jump to: navigation, search
Line 8: Line 8:
  
 
::I agree with Father John.[[User:Wsk|Wsk]] 18:41, June 18, 2007 (PDT)
 
::I agree with Father John.[[User:Wsk|Wsk]] 18:41, June 18, 2007 (PDT)
 +
 +
:: I disagree, since ''Apostolos'' (or ''Apostol'') is how the book is most often actually titled.  This is an article on a technical term, just as the articles on the ''Horologion'', ''Hieratikon'', ''Liturgikon'' (etc.) are.  &mdash;[[User:ASDamick|<font size="3.5" color="green" face="Adobe Garamond Pro, Garamond, Georgia, Times New Roman">Fr. Andrew</font>]] <sup>[[User_talk:ASDamick|<font color="red">talk</font>]]</sup> <small>[[Special:Contributions/ASDamick|<font color="black">contribs</font>]]</small> 05:46, June 19, 2007 (PDT)

Revision as of 12:46, June 19, 2007

Is there a compelling reason to list all of the epistles here in addition to the listing here? [[User:Magda|—magda (talk)]] 14:44, 6 Aug 2005 (EDT)

Suggestion about the Title

I would suggest changing the title of this article to "Epistle Book", since most English speaking Orthodox speak of reading "the Epistle" rather than reading the "Apostolos" or the "Apostol". Not a big deal, but I think that title better reflects commons usage.

-Fr. John Whiteford 3-22-07

I agree with Father John.Wsk 18:41, June 18, 2007 (PDT)
I disagree, since Apostolos (or Apostol) is how the book is most often actually titled. This is an article on a technical term, just as the articles on the Horologion, Hieratikon, Liturgikon (etc.) are. —Fr. Andrew talk contribs 05:46, June 19, 2007 (PDT)