Open main menu

OrthodoxWiki β


OrthodoxWiki talk:Trapeza

2,919 bytes added, 03:02, June 18, 2016
no edit summary
== Notice Refectory instead of Trapeza==Does anyone really think this page should be named "refectory" instead? <small>—The preceding unsigned comment was added by [[User:FrJohn|FrJohn]] ([[User talk:FrJohn|talk]] • [[Special:Contributions/FrJohn|contribs]]) {{{2|}}}.</small>
: Well, maybe. But most monastic trapezas I've been to have been decidedly short on the chattiness. :) &mdash;[[User:ASDamick|<font color="blue"><b><i>Dcn. Andrew</i></b></font>]] <sup>[[User_talk:ASDamick|<font color="red">talk</font>]]</sup> <sup>[[Special:Randompage|<font color="blue">random</font>]]</sup> <sup>[[Special:Contributions/ASDamick|<font color="black">contribs</font>]]</sup> 10:23, August 16, 2006 (CDT) :Yep, but I one of serial vandalsstill would say they do serve as the main social spots for monasteries, trolls and sockpuppetters of Wikipediawouldn't you? Just maybe not during the actual mealtime. [[User:FrJohn|Fr. BasicallyJohn]] :trapeza is eastern, refectory is western; "I vandalize in say potahto, you say poteyto..." ==New discussion on the bottom==Most MediaWiki discussions get added to the bottom (like using the French and + tab on a little in Russian sectiontalk page). I was going to create an "Add new topic" link to this project page, but unfortunatelythat wouldn't work well if we want new stuff at the top. Can we change the policy so we add stuff to the bottom? --[[User:RockOfVictory|J. J.]] 11:04, all my open proxies there are blockedAugust 16, therefore 2006 (CDT) :I think the reason you gave is enough to change things from how I have come herefirst imagined them. — [[User:FrJohn|<b>FrJohn</b>]] ([ talk]) DONE. It's been changed. --[[User:RockOfVictory|J. J. Against your encyclopaedia ]] 08:10, August 17, 2006 (CDT)  you could call it archondariki, nai? ==Athanasian Quicumque==On the discussion page of [[Athanasian Creed]] article I have nothingadded new material without response. Resumé from other discussion page on same thing: In the year 1644, only forGerard Voss, in his "De Tribus Symbolis", gave weighty probability to the opinion that St. Athanasius was not its author. His reasons may be reduced to the two following: > >firstly, but my no early writer of authority speaks of it as the work is of this doctor; and >secondly, its language and structure point to a Western, rather than to an Alexandrian, origin."  Both points are answered by the hypothesis that St Athanasius wrote them in simple Latin (which he never fully mastered, and in which he dared no stylistic flourish) when he met the men of Augusta Treverorum (Trier, Trèves) who know no Greek, during his two year exile there. And that it was for thatvery reason preserved independently of the Greek tradition until very late.  Discussion welcomed at the article's discussion page. == OCA Communications == It's funny to see the OCA press releases copying word-for-word from Orthodoxwiki! (See the last paragraph of this article [ Two days and two historic celebrations in Juneau, Alaska] and the first paragraph of [[Andrew Kashevaroff]]) [[User:Katjuscha|Katjuscha]] ([[Usertalk:Katjuscha|talk]]) 02:46, June 18, 2016 (UTC) :I am And that is your new vandalwork! You have every right to complain to them about attribution. — [[User:FrJohn|I am your <b>FrJohn</b>]] ([ vandaltalk]] 21) 03:1102, May 31June 18, 2009 2016 (UTC)
Bureaucrats, Check users, interwiki, oversight, renameuser, Administrators