Difference between revisions of "Category talk:OCA Dioceses"
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
What say we rename these to [[Diocese of the South (OCA)]] and such? It seems to be a neater way of doing things, especially when we consider that most of the Orthodox world's dioceses will simply be named "Diocese of Place" without any need for a modifier. Mind you, this would probably create the need for some emendation of the [[OrthodoxWiki:Style Manual|Style Manual]], but where we have parallel, overlapping dioceses, I think some adjustment might be in order. —[[User:ASDamick|{{User:ASDamick/sig}}]] 08:20, 16 Jun 2005 (EDT) | What say we rename these to [[Diocese of the South (OCA)]] and such? It seems to be a neater way of doing things, especially when we consider that most of the Orthodox world's dioceses will simply be named "Diocese of Place" without any need for a modifier. Mind you, this would probably create the need for some emendation of the [[OrthodoxWiki:Style Manual|Style Manual]], but where we have parallel, overlapping dioceses, I think some adjustment might be in order. —[[User:ASDamick|{{User:ASDamick/sig}}]] 08:20, 16 Jun 2005 (EDT) | ||
| + | |||
| + | :I like that idea. It sounds much clearer. --[[User:Magda|magda]] 09:03, 16 Jun 2005 (EDT) | ||
Revision as of 13:03, June 16, 2005
What say we rename these to Diocese of the South (OCA) and such? It seems to be a neater way of doing things, especially when we consider that most of the Orthodox world's dioceses will simply be named "Diocese of Place" without any need for a modifier. Mind you, this would probably create the need for some emendation of the Style Manual, but where we have parallel, overlapping dioceses, I think some adjustment might be in order. —[[User:ASDamick|—Fr. Andrew talk contribs (THINK!)]] 08:20, 16 Jun 2005 (EDT)
- I like that idea. It sounds much clearer. --magda 09:03, 16 Jun 2005 (EDT)
