Difference between revisions of "Category talk:OCA Dioceses"
Joe Rodgers (talk | contribs) (added my two cents) |
|||
| Line 2: | Line 2: | ||
:I like that idea. It sounds much clearer. --[[User:Magda|magda]] 09:03, 16 Jun 2005 (EDT) | :I like that idea. It sounds much clearer. --[[User:Magda|magda]] 09:03, 16 Jun 2005 (EDT) | ||
| + | |||
| + | : I definetely like that idea. I just didn't want to usurp the Style Manual. I say go for it! --[[User:Joe Rodgers|Joe Rodgers]] 10:57, 16 Jun 2005 (EDT) | ||
Revision as of 14:57, June 16, 2005
What say we rename these to Diocese of the South (OCA) and such? It seems to be a neater way of doing things, especially when we consider that most of the Orthodox world's dioceses will simply be named "Diocese of Place" without any need for a modifier. Mind you, this would probably create the need for some emendation of the Style Manual, but where we have parallel, overlapping dioceses, I think some adjustment might be in order. —[[User:ASDamick|—Fr. Andrew talk contribs (THINK!)]] 08:20, 16 Jun 2005 (EDT)
- I like that idea. It sounds much clearer. --magda 09:03, 16 Jun 2005 (EDT)
- I definetely like that idea. I just didn't want to usurp the Style Manual. I say go for it! --Joe Rodgers 10:57, 16 Jun 2005 (EDT)
