Talk:Magi - Revision history

Fr Lev at 16:14, July 24, 2008

2008-07-24T16:14:22Z

Fr Lev at 16:14, July 24, 2008

2008-07-24T16:14:01Z

Fr Lev: New page: If the Magi are commemorated by the Church -- and they have been in both Eastern and Western tradition (before the Great Schism), then they are saints. I therefore removed (again) the stat...

2008-07-24T16:11:53Z

New page: If the Magi are commemorated by the Church -- and they have been in both Eastern and Western tradition (before the Great Schism), then they are saints. I therefore removed (again) the stat...

New page

If the Magi are commemorated by the Church -- and they have been in both Eastern and Western tradition (before the Great Schism), then they are saints. I therefore removed (again) the statement that it is unknown whether they have ben regarded as saints. --[[User:Fr Lev|Fr Lev]] 16:11, July 24, 2008 (UTC)

← Older revision		Revision as of 16:14, July 24, 2008
Line 1:		Line 1:
	If the Magi are commemorated by the Church -- and they have been in both Eastern and Western tradition (before the Great Schism), then they are saints. I therefore removed (again) the statement that it is unknown whether they have ben regarded as saints. --[[User:Fr Lev\|Fr Lev]] 16:11, July 24, 2008 (UTC)		If the Magi are commemorated by the Church -- and they have been in both Eastern and Western tradition (before the Great Schism), then they are saints. I therefore removed (again) the statement that it is unknown whether they have ben regarded as saints. --[[User:Fr Lev\|Fr Lev]] 16:11, July 24, 2008 (UTC)

−	I also restored the reference to the Latin tradition from which we have the names of the Magi as given in this article. There are other traditions, e.g., Armenian and Syriac, that give very different names. ~~--[[User:Fr Lev\|Fr Lev]] 16:14, July 24, 2008 (UTC)~~--[[User:Fr Lev\|Fr Lev]] 16:14, July 24, 2008 (UTC)	+	I also restored the reference to the Latin tradition from which we have the names of the Magi as given in this article. There are other traditions, e.g., Armenian and Syriac, that give very different names. --[[User:Fr Lev\|Fr Lev]] 16:14, July 24, 2008 (UTC)

← Older revision		Revision as of 16:14, July 24, 2008
Line 1:		Line 1:
	If the Magi are commemorated by the Church -- and they have been in both Eastern and Western tradition (before the Great Schism), then they are saints. I therefore removed (again) the statement that it is unknown whether they have ben regarded as saints. --[[User:Fr Lev\|Fr Lev]] 16:11, July 24, 2008 (UTC)		If the Magi are commemorated by the Church -- and they have been in both Eastern and Western tradition (before the Great Schism), then they are saints. I therefore removed (again) the statement that it is unknown whether they have ben regarded as saints. --[[User:Fr Lev\|Fr Lev]] 16:11, July 24, 2008 (UTC)
		+
		+	I also restored the reference to the Latin tradition from which we have the names of the Magi as given in this article. There are other traditions, e.g., Armenian and Syriac, that give very different names. --[[User:Fr Lev\|Fr Lev]] 16:14, July 24, 2008 (UTC)--[[User:Fr Lev\|Fr Lev]] 16:14, July 24, 2008 (UTC)