Jump to: navigation, search

Talk:Responses to OCA autocephaly

43 bytes added, 02:38, May 21, 2008
Straw poll on title
Hi all. I do think this is an interesting conversation, and I wonder if some of the differences here result from a different sense about the ways these terms are used in different parts of the world.<br>
I am substantially in agreement with Fr. Andrew's reasoning. I find either "Byzantine..." or "Response'''s''' to" acceptable. If the article is titled "Responses...", I think Fr. Andrew's points should be made early on in the article for the sake of clarity. The other options feel wrong to me. It seems "Responses to..." would be the way to go here, although something like "Critiques of..." might , "Opposition to" or "Arguments against..." would be even better and more precise.<br>
Vasiliki and Seminarist -- please tone down the rhetoric a bit. I don't think it's necessary...<br>
Yours in Christ, — [[User:FrJohn|<b>FrJohn</b>]] ([ talk]) 02:11, May 21, 2008 (UTC) (a priest of the OCA)
Bureaucrats, Check users, interwiki, oversight, renameuser, Administrators

Navigation menu